THE HALF DECENT FOOTBALL MAGAZINE

25 September ~ When you watch football you hope that the game flows, the referee knows what he/she is doing and there's nothing really hideously unfair going on. That's what FIFA are there for – to make the game better; like stopping the keeper picking up back passes or allowing a player who's offside not to be offside, if you know what I mean. So why then haven't they sorted out penalties? If ever there was a case of the punishment not fitting the crime, this is it. Something barely discernible happens and before you know it the game's turned on its head.

For example, team X is being battered by team Y but in a rare foray upfield they are gifted a goal when their overlapping full-back falls as if shot near the goal-line. The myopic ref miles from play decides that the defender five yards from the incident was responsible and points to the spot. A goal from nowhere. And so it goes on, with every striker for every club hurling himself about like Tom Daley so they're given the goal their team can't produce properly.

Well, I reckon I've got the answer. Looking at the incidents that led to penalties I put them in four categories: a definite goal denied (ball handled on the line, say); a good chance prevented; a fair chance prevented; and "what's he given that for?". Virtually all the fouls fell into the last two groups. In other words, there weren't that many where a goal was likely and at best a shot might just have followed if the attacking player hadn't ended up on his backside. Yet 80 per cent of penalties result in a goal.
 
So to that answer. Draw an arc that curves round between the six-yard box and the area. Make sure it's of a radius of more than 12 yards. Fouls in this "zone" result in a penalty from the traditional penalty spot. Fouls beyond it but inside the penalty area result in a "direct penalty" from the nearest point of the arc. No defenders allowed anywhere near but the keeper can cavort about in the six-yard box to his heart's content.

End result – the ball hits some ponderous centre-half on the arm 17 yards from goal and the ref doesn't present the opposition with a goal from nowhere, just the chance of one. Not perfect but better. And when Egypt and Sweden have drawn after two hours of a tense but goalless World Cup tie, what better test of skill than a penalty shoot-out that comprises two penalties and three "direct penalties". I'm going send my dossier to the FA for approval. Wish me luck. Rob Bradley

Comments (5)
Comment by Dalef65 2010-09-25 15:06:29

Oh my lord....!!
Can we play with hockey sticks as well...?

Comment by ooh aah 2010-09-25 15:40:31

'In other words, there weren't that many where a goal was likely and at best a shot might just have followed if the attacking player hadn't ended up on his backside'

Well defenders are paid enough to know how to defend properly, and should stay on their feet then. Yes I'm looking at you Johnny Evans.

Comment by Bimbo Bred 2010-09-26 00:18:28

Sounds like FIFA's cup of tea. It's complicated, unnecessary and unenforceable.

If you could work in the need for "video evidence" (ie "a commercial break") you'd probably get the media involved.

Comment by ZoltanBuchan 2010-09-26 10:11:10

Part of your justification seems to be that it would prevent teams who are 'being battered' prdocung a 'goal from nowhere'. You do realise the fact that best team doesn't always win is central to the appeal of football, don't you?

If you want a 'practical' solution to diving, how about every penalty is reviewed by the FA/UEFA/FIFA/whoever after every game, anyone found to have dived receives an automatic 5 game ban. Would cut it out within a month.

Comment by Walker 2010-09-26 19:09:57

Consider the penalty as a deterrent.
In order to be effective, a deterrent has to present the offender or would be offender with a potentially disproportionately bad outcome.
Example: Imagine if the penalty for dropping litter was death.That would be a highly effective deterrent.
If handling or fouling in the box resulted in some sort of Charlie Corolli cum NASL free kick rather than an 80% chance of a goal against then everybody would be doing it sir!

Related articles

Extra time made redundant by more TV-friendly formats
The additional 30 minutes is already making way for penalties in some competitions Embed from Getty Images 22 August ~ “No one wants to see extra...
Scenes from football history, 290 ~ Penalty kicks
"'Bodyline' penalty kicks are declared 'just not cricket' by the FA" By Dave Robinson, from WSC 344...
Keepers to blame if weak penalties are scored
Equally not all missed penalties are the taker’s fault 23 July ~ There is an iconic photo that shows Gordon Banks, almost on the ground but...

More... penalties