20 August ~ Stephen Ireland’s comments on arriving at Aston Villa were pretty run-of-the-mill. He’s "really excited", "looking forward to showing what he can bring to the table", "looking forward to building up a relationship with the fans" and his "number one target is to work hard for his team-mates". The only part missing from his spiel was the "I’m looking forward to working with X manager, who I’ve respected for a long time"-type quote. Ireland, of course, couldn’t practise this sort of fawning because Villa are currently managerless. While the exchange of Ireland and James Milner has been one of the summer’s more inevitable transfers, since Martin O’Neill walked out it has become far from standard fare.

Milner’s departure from Villa appeared certain since the World Cup and the fans won’t have been at all surprised that O’Neill’s departure did little to prevent the transfer going through. However, while most of them consider Stephen Ireland to be a good fit for their squad, shouldn’t they be a worried by his arrival? After all, who signed him?

Ireland is reportedly valued at around £8 million within this exchange deal. While caretaker manager Kevin MacDonald says his arrival is a "great boost" for Villa, he confesses that he hasn’t really sat down and talked to chairman Randy Lerner about the transfer. Oddly, throughout the last few days the transfer’s delay has seemed to come from Ireland negotiating a pay-off from Man City, rather than from any questions about whether or not he is wanted any more by managerless Villa. Surely, the only conclusion that can then be drawn is that it’s the Villa board who are signing Stephen Ireland.

In Madrid and Shepherds Bush they are used to their chairmen signing players with limited consent of managers. But Randy Lerner hasn’t seemed the dictatorial type until now. Since his arrival at Villa, he has introduced popular fan consultation sessions, made ticket prices relatively affordable, and generally impressed with his understated, charitable manner. Villa fans have also been pretty happy with his level of investment in players. When O’Neill left, it was widely believed that the Irishman had been unhappy with the board’s new unwillingness to continue to spend on players, but perhaps the actual reason was the board’s new desire to pick which players they bought? Perhaps O’Neill left because he didn’t want Ireland rather than because he wanted lots of other players too.

Despite bookies at one point no longer taking bets on Bob Bradley arriving at Villa Park, it doesn’t now appear that Lerner has anyone waiting in the wings to take over. Rather than sounding like the oft-heard attempts of former assistants to disguise their desire for their club’s top job, MacDonald’s "I’ve not really thought about doing the job long term" comment after Saturday’s game seemed genuine. Especially when he described his experience at the helm as "surreal" and "a lot to get my head around". Unless MacDonald pulls together an amazing string of results this month, it’s more than likely that a new manager will arrive in the next few weeks. But how will Eriksson, Jol, Bradley or whoever it is feel about Ireland? If the midfielder plays badly, the new manager won’t be able to dismiss him as one of the last manager’s buys. And will there be any more players arriving before a new manager?

Anther question raised by this affair is what are Stephen Ireland’s motivations for signing at Villa? He’s probably right to consider Villa an appropriate team for him, but few players in the past will have committed to long-term deals at clubs without knowing who their manager will be. Perhaps nowadays players like Ireland, who in five years at City had four different bosses, have grown so used to changing name plaques on the manager’s office door that who manages a team is no longer a factor in whether or not to sign for them. Simon Cotterill

Comments (2)
Comment by Hitz 2010-08-20 11:08:15

It's a fairly simple answer.

MON would have been happy with Ireland. Seeing as the quality of MON's transfer purchases wasn't the reason he left, the chairman had no reason not to continue to trust the manager's judgement.

Given that negotiations in the Milner transfer had been ongoing since May, presumably both clubs were not about to throw a spanner in the works at the eleventh hour. MON's resignation and Ireland's steadfastness at a payout from Man City were not about to de-rail the transfer.

Knowing full well Villa probably won't get a manager in before the window shuts, Villa saw fit to press on with signing Ireland. Otherwise the club would be in a position of losing its manager and midfield talisman with no obvious replacement.

A sensible deal from Villa.

Comment by Red Adder 2010-08-22 10:06:12

Potentially as good as several of Mancini's signings at three times the price Villa may have got the bargain of the season. Some of Ireland's comments about Man City, whilst understandable, show that he still hasn't grown up, and leaves the doubt that he will have some very good runs (eg 2008-09) but then be less so. Of course Bellamy - 7 yars older - is still whinging about never being loved wherever he as been - perhaps being an immature *hole may have had something to do with it.

Related articles

Graham Taylor: In his own words
Peloton Publishing, £18.99Reviewed by David HarrisonFrom WSC 375, April 2018Buy the book The untimely loss of Graham Taylor in January 2017...
From the archive ~ Don’t try spare your kids when choosing their team
If you let your children support a different, better team you will only spoil their heritage, warned Damon Green in WSC 298, December 2011 A...
Classic match ~ Birmingham City 1-2 Aston Villa, Division Two, 1987
. . The last time a Second City derby took place in the second tier Andy Kennedy broke the net but it wasn’t enough...