THE HALF DECENT FOOTBALL MAGAZINE

10 June ~ The level of knowledge saturation in the global game means no teams will be able to spring radical tactical surprises at the World Cup, but there is nonetheless likely to be plenty of diversity on show when it comes to formations. The 4-2-3-1 was the dominant shape in 2006 and will probably be so again in South Africa, with England, Brazil, Spain, Germany and the Netherlands among the sides predicted to adopt 4-2-3-1s or hybrids thereof.

France, however, are set to ditch their usual 4-2-3-1 for a 4-3-3, while Italy and Argentina are both believed to be flirting with the idea of a three-man defence. Chile are strong contenders to be the tournament's most pioneering team with the 3-3-1-3 system.

There is variety in the Premier League too, with champions Chelsea leading the way last season by flitting between a 4-1-2-1-2 (midfield diamond), a 4-3-2-1 Christmas tree and an ultra-attacking 4-3-3 over the course of the campaign. And yet, despite Sam Allardyce's belief that it has become "antiquated", the formation of reference for England's top clubs remains the hardy 4-4-2.

Amid the soul-searching sparked by England's failure to qualify for Euro 2008, the 4-4-2 was held up in some quarters as a symbol of the country's slavish devotion to an outmoded tactical formula. José Mourinho had already wreaked havoc in his first two seasons at Chelsea by deploying a counter-attacking 4-3-3 that gave his side numerical domination in the middle of the pitch, and seemed to emphasise the lack of tactical awareness in the English game. "There is nothing a pure 4-4-2 can do to stop this," he said.

Modern tactical thinking typically concludes that formations are sliding ineluctably towards one-striker systems with massed midfield configurations. But of the sides that finished in the top 12 last season, only Arsenal, Liverpool, Everton and Allardyce's Blackburn consistently played with only one central forward.

By contrast, of the teams outside the Big Four that met or exceeded expectations – namely Fulham, Tottenham, Manchester City, Aston Villa, Birmingham and Stoke – two-striker formations were the order of the day. There are caveats. With Carlos Tévez dropping deep and playing with two genuine holding midfielders, City's shape was probably more akin to a 4-2-3-1, while Roy Hodgson occasionally set Fulham out in a distinct 4-4-1-1. Nonetheless, all six sides deployed a pair of central midfielders, a pair of genuine wide players and a pair of central forwards in the majority of their Premier League games, and all enjoyed seasons that rank among the best in their recent histories.

Improved fitness has probably played a part in the recent triumphs of the 4-4-2, while the popularity of "inside-out" wingers – who cut infield from the flanks into the middle of the pitch – prevents opponents who play in a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 enjoying a numerical advantage in central midfield. A lot of it simply comes down to good organisation. Simon Davies says that at Fulham: "Every day in training is geared towards team shape."

Chelsea's tactical flexibility suggests that an old-fashioned 4-4-2 might not be enough to cut the mustard over the course of an entire Premier League title race, but Fulham and co have demonstrated that it need not be the barrier to success that it is often automatically assumed to be. Tom Williams twitter.com/tomwfootball

Comments (6)
Comment by The Exploding Vole 2010-06-10 12:33:01

"The level of knowledge saturation"?

Comment by Durban Poisson 2010-06-10 13:13:26

The first 2 paragraphs gave me the impression this was going to be about the tactics that teams at this year's WC would employ, which I would love to read. But sadly after that it was all just about the bloody premier league again.

Comment by tomwfootball 2010-06-10 13:41:49

Durban Poisson, if you're after tactical information on the World Cup teams, I strongly recommend a visit to Zonal Marking: http://www.zonalmarking.net/

You can also find a breakdown of some of the key tactical issues here: http://tomwfootball.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/world-cup-2010-ten-tactical-questions/

I wrote this because I hadn't seen any tactical reviews of the Premier League season just gone and because I thought it was noteworthy that the much-maligned 4-4-2 was actually the catalyst for a great deal of success.

Comment by Durban Poisson 2010-06-10 13:54:20

Brilliant, thanks Tom. Great links.

Comment by ooh aah Paul McGraths da 2010-06-11 07:00:08

I would dispute that 4231 was the dominant formation in 2006. England, Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Brazil and I believe Aggentina all played variants of 442. Italy played a diamond in their midfield 4, but the rest were all pretty straightforward examples of 442 if irc

Comment by tomwfootball 2010-06-11 13:40:23

A lot depends on interpretation, but I'd assert that France, Italy and Portugal (three of the four semi-finalists) played 4-2-3-1, although you could argue Italy's shape was occasionally closer to 4-4-1-1:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_FIFA_World_Cup_knockout_stage

England played 4-1-4-1, Argentina 4-3-1-2 and Spain 4-3-3. I think Germany were the only side who deployed a classic 4-4-2 throughout the tournament.

Related articles

Football 2.0: How the world’s best play the modern game by Grant Wahl
BackPage, £12.99Reviewed by Charles MorrisFrom WSC 380, November 2018Buy the book Roberto Martínez is watching television at home...
Forget fancy passing – the long-ball game can be a thrilling tactic
Embed from Getty Images // Yes, short passing is a pure way to play football. But hoofing the ball upfield can be an effective way to get fans on...
The Mixer by Michael Cox
Harper Collins, £16.99Reviewed by Paul ReesFrom WSC 366, August 2017Buy the book There’s no getting around it, that is an extremely...