26 February ~ Wayne Bridge's decision to retire from international football is a disaster – not for the England football team, but for the press. With Ashley Cole's wife off to LA, the tension surrounding Bridge and John Terry was a godsend for a newspaper industry that lives off hype, fights and hyperbole. Bridge's decision to abstain from the England squad has robbed the press of the squabbling and hostility that sells papers. With no warring team-mates, there will be no rumours of simmering tension in the dressing room, no need to employ sign language experts to monitor the players' behaviour and not much to say before the tournament begins.

The press will be more upset by Bridge's decision than Fabio Capello. The England manager has lost a middling left-back, who was only ever likely to take up his usual role in the squad – filling in as Ashley Cole's understudy. Despite his broken ankle, Cole has every chance of being fit for England's opening fixture on June 12. And even if he does not make the squad, Bridge was never a certainty to take his place. Bridge has played poorly this season, both before and after his two-month absence with a knee injury. Alan Hansen went so far as to deem his display against Burnley in November as deserving "minus 6 out of 10". "It was that bad I just feel sorry him," said the normally restrained, if aloof, Hansen. The emergence of Leighton Baines and Stephen Warnock, coupled with the availability of Joleon Lescott, Gareth Barry and James Milner, all reduce the significance of Bridge's absence from the squad.

With Rio Ferdinand struggling with a recurring back injury and the positionally-dubious Glen Johnson still lacking match fitness, England's defence looks shaky. But Bridge was never going to be the catalyst to England winning the World Cup. He would, however, have added some spice to the media's coverage of the tournament. Today's reaction to Bridge's announcement barely disguises the papers' annoyance at his withdrawal. "Quitters win nothing," says Darren Lewis in the Mirror, "Weak men don't win World Cups," professes the Mail and Tony Evans in the Times goes so far as to question the legacy Bridge is leaving to his son. With even the normally erudite Jim White in the Telegraph denouncing Bridge's decision as a "spectacularly self-destructive fit of pique", it is clear the press are mourning the end of the saga.

Bridge asked not to be selected for his country as he could not come to play in the same team as Terry. But he also admitted that his position in the squad was "untenable and potentially divisive". With Bridge gone England have lost a decent full-back but they have also rid themselves of a divided dressing room. This is great news for the England team, but it won't sell many papers.

Comments (5)
Comment by sampson 2010-02-26 15:58:25

Bridge is a poor player. He has never been "World Class" and never will be.

Last week he played against Stoke in the Premier League and was completely out of his depth against Fuller and Sidibe. He looked, at best O.k. going forward, but was easily dealt with when our defenders closed him down.

The fact that the like's of Barry and Milliner (both midfielder) are being talked about as alternatives to Bridge says it all really.

Personally I'd like to see Ryan Shawcross given a go. He can play in the centre or on either side. He is not the best attacking player in the world, but is a solid defender (Terry being the only English defender worthy of comparison this season) and scores plenty of headers. Versatility is, of course very useful in a tournament squad and Ryan can cover any of the back four positions.

He is ten times the play that Lescott is.

Comment by imp 2010-02-26 16:36:42

Cometh the hour, cometh the man. I nominate Phil Neville for left-back.

Comment by Dalef65 2010-02-26 18:50:02

Wayne Bridge has a lot of mates in the England (and Chelsea) dressing rooms.So to blithely say that his withdrawal has rid England of a divided dressing room,as if he was the one at fault, is wide of the mark I would say. It could have even made the squad more divided than it would have otherwise been.
In answer to Sampson; Whilst i would probably agree that Wayne Bridge is not "world class",to describe a top Premier League player and the 2nd best English left back as "poor" is unbeleivably short sighted.Why all the criticsm of Wayne Bridge all of a sudden?
Also I cant see Ryan Shawcross,who i would describe as a decent up and coming CENTRE back being able to do it for England at LEFT back in the latter stages of a World Cup.
Finally of all the names mentioned so far here,Phil Neville is probably the best and most versatile.And why isnt anybody recommending Steven Warnock?

Comment by Kowalski 2010-02-27 02:05:13

How quickly we forget Kenny Sansom, a few errors 22 years ago and he's yesterday's man all of sudden.

Comment by George: Hofmeister bear 2010-02-27 03:16:08

Don't worry, his Norman Wisdom impressions as secured Kenny Sansom's place amongst the greats.

Related articles

Bobby Robson film offers smiles, tears and plenty of fond memories
Embed from Getty Images // Watching the elegantly put together More Than A Manager highlights why Robson was so revered by fans, players and...
Graham Taylor: In his own words
Peloton Publishing, £18.99Reviewed by David HarrisonFrom WSC 375, April 2018Buy the book The untimely loss of Graham Taylor in January 2017...
Alan Ball: The man in the white boots by David Tossell
Hodder & Stoughton, £20Reviewed by Mark O’BrienFrom WSC 374, March 2018Buy the book Early on in this detailed and warm biography...