Wednesday 5 August ~

Every football season begins with a "clampdown". Traditionally this involves referees acting on new directives to punish foul play. The result is a spate of bookings and dismissals in the early months of the season, accompanied by an outcry from managers. Referees then loosen their interpretation of the rules a little – often after a meeting with managers at which "robust views" are exchanged – and we end up roughly back to how things were before, except that at least one match official will have been maligned in highly personal terms. 

The tough line for 2009-10 is a revamping of the Respect campaign, relating to the attitudes of managers and players towards referees. Yesterday the FA warned that managers will be charged with improper conduct should they make any adverse comments about referees before or after matches. Clubs will also be charged if three or more players are deemed to have ganged up on the officials. The FA stress that they are not seeking to censor criticism of individual refereeing decisions but simply to discourage accusations that officials have been biased against their team. Sometime such claims can seem blatant, as when David Moyes asked whether Mike Riley was a Man Utd fan prior to his taking charge of Everton's FA Cup semi-final last season.

But will be much harder to act upon post-match reactions, given that managers rarely offer an unbiased assessment. As a general rule they will feel that referees have had a good game if their team has won and they will usually find reasons to complain about certain decisions after a defeat, not last because it may divert attention from mistakes they made in team selection or tactics.

Managers will want to test the limits of the new directives, which means that we may see a couple of high-profile cases in the early weeks of the season, with the accused asking why they have been pulled up when a fellow manager had avoided censure for an identical comment. Neil Warnock, the doyen of ref-baiters, has already demonstrated a direction in which this might lead. After a series of contentious decisions in a Palace match last season, he read out some critical comments Sir Alex Ferguson had made about a referee a few weeks earlier, then pointed out that no action had been taken so he assumed that they could be repeated word for word.

The crux of the problem is that referees are constantly undermined by television's microscopic scrutiny of every important incident in a match. Decisions that have to be made in a split second are subsequently pored over in slow motion and from every possible angle. Managers are then often given the opportunity to review key incidents while being interviewed immediately after a game. But as the professional game is now funded by television, for better or worse, the football authorities are unlikely to raise complaints against the often overblown and self-serving post-match analysis. The only way that referees will receive more respectful treatment would be if managers resolved not to talk about the officials' decisions at all directly after a match. But the temptation is likely to be too strong to be curbed by the odd fine. 

Comments (5)
Comment by The Exploding Vole 2009-08-05 14:20:53

Referees could be encouraged to offer an assessment of the mistakes players made during the match.

Comment by Amor de Cosmos 2009-08-05 17:58:15

Until the FA backs up its words with actions (ie: massive fines or suspensions) this dance will continue forever.

Comment by petermoss 2009-08-06 10:03:09

It would also help if the LMA is seen to be doing its bit to police its own members. My perception is that you only hear from the League Managers Association when there has been a spate of managerial sackings or a manager is appointed without the required coaching badges. The organisation may be backers of the Respect campaign; if it is it needs to crank up its profile in this area and be seen to be censuring those members who seemingly take little notice of the Respect programme. You only need to spend a small amount of time in grassroots football to know how vital it is that the Respect programme is a success and achieves its objectives. A meaningful contribution from those at the top of the game is crucial to this.

Comment by ooh aah 2009-08-06 11:05:57

I think there is also an argument to be made that referee's will gain more respect by earning it through on field excellence, rather than it being enforced by the FA. One of the strengths of Collina was he got most of the big decisions right. Whereas I suspect Mike Riley probably get's less than 40% of the big decisions right

Comment by fbrazolin 2009-08-07 20:58:26

"The crux of the problem is that referees are constantly undermined by television's microscopic scrutiny of every important incident in a match."

Got it right.

Related articles

Hopes for 2018 ~ part one
Embed from Getty Images // A failed World Cup, underdogs having their day and free drinks during VAR decisions – WSC contributors on what...
Referees’ tolerance of foul play annoyed fans and blighted 1950s matches
Embed from Getty Images // Restrained use of yellow cards by officials meant any caution was headline news but that attitude was not always for...

More... referees