WSC Logo

rss

Sign up for the WSC Weekly Howl

A small portion of despair and enlightenment delivered to your inbox every Friday

 

First name
Surname
Email

newissue medrec 316

gplus50

wsc writers comp

chairman 170x140


Sheffield Wednesday should avoid Joey Barton

Loan move from QPR would be unfair

icon barton318 July ~ Joey Barton has never been one to shy away from the headlines and his potential loan move away from Queens Park Rangers has created a stir. The volatile Barton was handed a 12-match ban and £75,000 fine by the FA after he was found guilty of two counts of violent conduct in QPR's final game against Manchester City last season when clashing with Carlos Tevez, Sergio Aguero and Vincent Kompany. After an internal investigation, QPR decided to fine him a further six weeks wages, strip him of the club captaincy and leave him out of their pre-season tour of Asia.

It is the latest chapter in a long line of scandals that have littered Barton's career and the third time in five seasons that he has been charged for violent conduct by the FA. He was sentenced to a four-month suspended prison sentence and a six-match ban after assaulting Manchester City team-mate Ousmane Dabo in 2007, and was given a retrospective three-match ban for punching Morten Gamst Pedersen in the chest when playing for Newcastle in November 2010.

It is believed QPR are keen to wash their hands of the player but it would cost them a staggering £11 million to terminate his contract as he still has three years remaining on his £70,000-a-week deal. Consequently, manager Mark Hughes is said to be considering a loan move to a Football League side as a more effective solution. If Barton were to stay at QPR, his 12-match ban would not expire until mid-November. If loaned to a Championship side, he would be eligible to play from mid-October due to the higher concentration of League games and early stages of the newly-christened Capital One Cup. QPR would be bending the rules, to say the least.

Newly promoted Sheffield Wednesday have emerged as favourites to strike a deal for the midfielder, although it is believed that Nottingham Forest and Blackburn Rovers are also in pursuit. But why would any team take on a player capable of causing unrest in the dressing room and who is unable to play the first 12 games?

Although details of a potential loan deal have yet to be revealed, it is believed QPR will cover the majority of the player's extortionate wages and could be prepared to let Barton stay on loan until the January transfer window to gain match fitness.

This would allow Barton to assist a Championship side over the busy festive period. A January return would also allow QPR to compensate for the loss of Samba Diakite if Mali advance to the African Cup of Nations in South Africa early next year.

Alternatively, if QPR were keen to reinstate Barton to the first-team as soon as his suspension had elapsed, a fringe member of QPR's first-team squad could also make a loan move to the proposed club. Established Championship strikers such as Jay Boothroyd, DJ Campbell and Heidar Helguson appear to have fallen out of favour at Loftus Road and might relish the chance of regular first-team football, albeit a step down.

Sheffield Wednesday manager Dave Jones expressed his desire to take Barton to Hillsborough: "If he became available, he would be a player we'd look at. The deal would need to be right for the club and for Joey." Jones, who is chasing back-to-back promotions: "He's got a reputation but then so have a number of players we've got at this club and it wouldn't be something that would put us off bringing a player of Joey's calibre to the club."

While Owls fans do not deny his undoubted ability, they do not all seem convinced Barton would be a useful addition to the squad. On Sheffield Wednesday's fans forum Owlstalk, there were concerns the deal would affect squad morale. One fan protested: "There has to be a limit as to how many bad apples a manager can take on."

Another supporter was keen to start a "he has sinned and I never want him in a Wednesday shirt" campaign. Other fans were more concerned that the deal would damage their club's reputation: "I cannot believe our club will want to tarnish its image for a fast buck."

While a loan move could prove a potential masterstroke for Championship managers, it also represents a risky gamble. Manchester City, Newcastle United and QPR have all given chances to Barton to prove his maturity at the highest level. How many more does he need? Max Bentley

On the subject...

Comment on 18-07-2012 11:06:36 by richsal #692195
After the Paul Alcock affair, Paolo di Canio was Hillsborough’s bad apple. The club were quick to punish him and shortly after his suspension ended he was shipped out to West Ham for a fraction of his market value. Whilst he went on to become a Hammers legend it marked the start of a long decline at Wednesday. Maybe this time it’s our turn to benefit from an out of favour player who would undoubtedly make a big impact at this level. Dave Jones already has squad members who’ve had run-ins with the law (Gary Madine, Joe Mattock and last season, Nile Ranger) and it seems that his ultra-calm approach rubs off on the players. If Joey does end up having another ‘episode’, we simply hand him back to QPR.
Comment on 18-07-2012 13:42:20 by Houdi Elbow #692243
I think Wednesday were on a slippery slope long before Di Canio arrived. My instinct would be to steer well clear of Barton for well documented reasons and his unsavoury character, although if anyone can manage him then Dave Jones can. I'm not sure of the value of signing a player who has a 12 match ban, particularly if he was serving it with us and that's why I can't really see it happening.
Comment on 18-07-2012 13:48:08 by Janik #692247
"If loaned to a Championship side, he would be eligible to play from mid-October due to the higher concentration of League games and early stages of the newly-christened Capital One Cup. QPR would be bending the rules, to say the least."

Not really, because there is next to no chance of QPR including Barton in their 25-man Premiership squad. They already had too many players for that last season and had to leave some out, and have bought a bunch more since. So Barton will be ineligible for QPR in the league up to the end of December, whenever his suspension should happen to end.
Comment on 18-07-2012 16:30:10 by Tricky #692309
Please for Gods sake Forest, steer clear of this ticking bomb.
Comment on 18-07-2012 18:04:53 by Amor de Cosmos #692329
QPR's management will do everything they can to avoid Barton appearing in hoops again. If they can't move him, he'll sit, as there's a long list of midfielders in front of him now. Only a string of injuries would necessitate his return. He'll go somewhere on loan, then, if he's been a good boy, somewhere permanent before the transfer deadline, or next Summer.

It's believed the club has added a clause that includes a Twitter ban, to his contract. He's certainly gone quiet lately. More pertinently, that further violent conduct will be cause for termination. No one's confirming this of course, but it makes sense for both parties. QPR could send him on (very expensive) gardening leave for the remaining three years of his contract which, effectively, would end his career. If true then a loan makes sense, if he screws up he could be returned to Loftus Road, then fired.

BTW: Where does the £70,000 per week figure come from? Not saying it's wrong but I've never seen his salary confirmed anywhere.

Also, Bothroyd and Helguson are both in the club's plans as of now, Heider very much so. Only injuries that would keep him out I think.
Comment on 18-07-2012 18:30:52 by Janik #692336
I think firing Barton for another violent conduct red card would be a hard case to make. QPR haven't taken similar action over players being sent-off in the past, so it would look like a special case is being made for a specific individual, which doesn't sit well with employment tribunals. QPR gave him that contract, they are going to have to live with (and pay for) that decision.
Comment on 18-07-2012 19:36:32 by Amor de Cosmos #692353
It might preclude red cards, the Man City incident only included one, but there were three violent outbursts. Otherwise if it's something that's been agreed to by both Barton and the club and is part of his contract then the clause would apply — assuming it exists.
Comment on 20-07-2012 17:42:21 by YankGunner #692991
Joey Barton, a psychopath with anger-management issues, should--quite simply--be banned from professional football. (Of course I can see some foolish team in MLS picking him up.)

Discuss this article

You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you don't have an account yet.


 

© When Saturday Comes Limited 2013 | Contact | Privacy & cookies | Sitemap | Managed hosting by Latitude