WSC Logo

rss

Sign up for the WSC Weekly Howl

A small portion of despair and enlightenment delivered to your inbox every Friday

 

First name
Surname
Email

newissue medrec 316

gplus50

wsc writers comp

chairman 170x140


England begin to expect the unexpected

They will have to cope with high hopes

icon hodgsonengland1June 19 ~ The England football team seem to suffer from a unique problem. It's not that they aren't good enough, but that they don't cope well when they are thought to be better than they are: when expectations go up, they become flustered and don't perform. It is an unusual problem. Other athletes rarely complain about expectations. Characters such as Pete Sampras, Stephen Hendry and Floyd Mayweather, who dominated their sports, used expectations to their advantage. These men thrived on knowing they were favourites. They used their confidence and reputations to intimidate opponents.

The moment Tiger Woods lost his veneer of perfection and proved he was human, his power to scare the opposition disappeared. Perhaps Tim Henman, the most English of sportsmen, suffered from too much public faith at Wimbledon. But he just wasn't good enough.

The new England of 2012 was meant to be different. They had no manager, no captain, an injured midfield and their best player in the stands. Expectations were lower than ever and the tone was kept downbeat. Roy Hodgson went through the build-up to Euro 2012 without being asked if England could win the tournament. Even the excitable football writers kept to the script.

But things are changing. A draw against a good France team and a win over an average Sweden side has applied some gentle pressure on these most fragile of players. Even Hodgson is starting to dream: "You play football at international level to try to get people to get carried away. Dreaming is what football is about and we're happy that people now think we can go a bit further."

With the England manager admitting that he "is on a roll", the press have allowed themselves to enjoy the high spirits. The Independent's Sam Wallace has seen a "keen sense of momentum behind England"; Henry Winter of the Telegraph reports that Hodgson "wants to make dreams some true"; Gabby Logan has written in the Times that the players are becoming "a band of brothers". The back page of today's Mirror urges the nation to: "Dare to Dream."

It is tempting to assume that England are doing well due to the lack of expectations. Perhaps they have benefited from an understated approach at these championships, but as their performances improve, the players, manager, press and public will naturally begin to expect more.

Expectations are a function of a team's performance, so it will be impossible to stay restrained for the whole tournament. England are incapable of winning a single game without totting up the so-called years of hurt, so if they progress to the later stages, they will need to learn to turn higher hopes to their advantage.

Plenty of sportsmen have benefitted from the confidence and aura that comes from winning. If England fail, it will not be because they dreamed they could win, but because, like poor Henman with his followers on his hill, they just don't have it in them. Paul Campbell

On the subject...

Comment on 19-06-2012 22:15:07 by Diable Rouge #680364
The very definition of hubris?
Comment on 20-06-2012 09:26:28 by jameswba #680471
I think we're now seeing why Hodgson was the right man for the job. He knows how to make the most of a team's strengths, account for its limitations and get previously under-performing players (eg Gerrard) to make genuine contributions.

Scott Parker is doing well. I don't understand why people are still criticising him for not doing things he isn't in the team to do. He's not Andreas Iniesta, he lacks either the vision or the skill to play truly incisive passes. But he can make simple passes and make himself available to receive the return - perhaps better than any other England defensive midfielder of recent times. After a difficult first 15 mins or so of last night's game, Parker was the hub of a 15(or so)-pass sequence. It didn't lead to a chance for his team, but it relieved that early pressure. He didn't give much away all night.

The 'goal that wasn't', meanwhile, only underlines what a waste of air miles and hotel space these goal-line officials are. Surely one of the situations they're most primed for is one where an attacker is through on goal and a defender is running back beyond the 'keeper(?) Even if it was 'too difficult' to see that the ball was in, that again suggests the role is useless.

Italy will probably be favourites in the QF. But even getting that far, and encouraging a slight growth in expectation in doing so, is more than most England supporters hoped for before the tournament started.
Comment on 20-06-2012 15:57:40 by Coral #680624
I heard a couple of callers and Alan say that should England win Euro 2012 it is not enough (my fault for putting on 606). When Greece won in 2004 nothing delighted Alan about it, if England win it 2012 then so far nothing has delighted him and a series of callers agree so it would be a hollow win. Apparently we have to be realistic and see that England have been poor. I would see being realistic as thinking we would be lucky to finish second in the group yet we have actually topped the group undefeated so should be allowed to have a slight feeling of joy. I know I shouldn't be happy at England not losing a game and should be focusing on how we don't have the ball enough or whatever other stick we should beat the team with, but I am a little bit happy. Cheers Roy.
Comment on 20-06-2012 20:57:01 by jameswba #680704
If Arry had been in charge, going out at the group stages would have been fine. Training would have been a laugh, because he's a player's manager, and there'd be hope for the future.

Discuss this article

You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you don't have an account yet.


 

© When Saturday Comes Limited 2013 | Contact | Privacy & cookies | Sitemap | Managed hosting by Latitude