13 December ~ Last week’s suspicious results in the Champions League weren’t the only games coming under scrutiny at a time when barely a month seems to pass without allegations from somewhere in the football world of bribery, cheating and corruption. The US edition of Sports Illustrated revealed that a number of group stage matches in last summer’s Concacaf Gold Cup are under scrutiny from FIFA, mainly involving what FIFA’s head of security Chris Eaton called "incredibly unusual and extreme" odds in Asia offered on in-game bets where heavy losers Cuba, Grenada and El Salvador were taking part.

Cuba and Grenada finished bottom of their groups, with goal differences of minus 15 and minus 14, respectively. Were they involved in match-fixing or were they just rubbish? Neither country boasts a history of major football achievement but they had reached the tournament by making it to the semi-finals of the 2010 Caribbean Championship, both beating Trinidad & Tobago on the way. Nowadays any manager employing reasonably smart tactics can coach an inferior team to play defensively enough to avoid a whacking. Or three.

At the final group game between Guatemala and Grenada, which ended in a 4-0 win for Guatemala, I was sitting in the press box at Red Bull Arena in Harrison, New Jersey, directly behind the Grenada bench. I didn't think there was anything remotely suspicious about the tie at the time, despite the fact that misfiring Guatemala had failed to score in their first two games, but created a whole ton of chances against Grenada. As well as their goals, they hit the woodwork on three occasions. But then this was a Grenada team that had just lost 7-1 to equally low-scoring Honduras (a team that scored just one more goal – a penalty – in their other four games at the tournament).

Looking at the highlights, the first two goals seem especially dubious. The Guatemalan midfielder Jose de Aguila is given an unusually generous amount of time and space to shoot for the first. For the second, Grenada’s Ricky Charles seems to make no effort at all to prevent his opponent Marco Pappa from shooting. In fact, he almost seems to step aside. As for goalkeeper Shemel Louison’s attempt to save it, his grandmother was probably reaching for a pair of gloves and planning to give him a few handling tips upon his imminent return home.

By the second half, a few furious Grenadan fans had gathered in the seating area just to my right. Without any intervention from stewards, the fans spent the second 45 minutes ignoring the game and relentlessly abusing the players on the bench before us. At the time, I thought they were being incredibly harsh and couldn’t believe they weren’t moved away. In retrospect, they clearly saw something strange in their players' performances that fired their ire. Nobody knows better than fans when their team is not playing to its capabilities. They were only placated at the final whistle when some of the players approached them, smiled, chatted amiably and shook their hands.

The Grenadan players seemed absolutely unperturbed by the result or the fact that their fans were steamed up. Depending on your point of view, that could represent an admirably sensible perspective on the importance of football – and the Gold Cup in particular – or a shockingly unprofessional attitude and an insulting slap in the face to the paying public. Or something else we cannot say for legal reasons.

It is worth noting, however, that no Grenadan players perform at the game's top level. At best, a few play in the English lower divisions and Major League Soccer. The rest play in the Caribbean leagues. When so many are being enriched by the game at the top, it is easy to see how the possibility of making extra cash could become tempting for players in their thirties who know they are unlikely to escape the Trinidad & Tobago Pro League or the Cuban top flight.

That is an explanation, not an excuse. If it is proven that Cuba, Grenada and El Salvador threw their games, they should be banned from international competition for a long time. FIFA’s Eaton told Sports Illustrated that the investigations “have revealed a significant international criminal input into match-fixing in football”, but that with co-operation between police, prosecutors and international sporting bodies, he believes the problem can be stopped. It is probably not in his remit to suggest that a more egalitarian distribution of the game's wealth might not do any harm either. Ian Plenderleith

Comments (8)
Comment by jameswba 2011-12-13 11:58:37

Interesting piece. I would say it's a refreshing change from the debates over the Zagreb-Lyon game but of course the topic is depressingly similar.

'The rest play in the Caribbean leagues. When so many are being enriched by the game at the top, it is easy to see how the possibility of making extra cash could become tempting for players in their thirties who know they are unlikely to escape the Trinidad & Tobago Pro League or the Cuban top flight.'

Where betting-related match-fixing is concerned, I think this is indeed at the heart of it. In truth, given the reach of the betting industry now - you can go in a Slovak betting-shop and pile your money on a Welsh league game, for God's sake, to say nothing of online gambling - I'd actually be surprised if there wasn't more fixing at these lower levels than is already suspected.

As for the Grenadan fans' abuse of their players, well normally few things are more depressing than that sort of behaviour. But if you've taken the trouble to be there, paid your money to watch and genuinely feel your players aren't trying, for whatever reason, it begins to seem just a little understandable.

Comment by geobra 2011-12-13 13:27:31

In Italy it is suspected that a lot of match-fixing results not from 'unequal earnings' but quite simply from lower division clubs finding themselves unable to pay their players at all.

When I first came to Italy in 1987 there were no betting shops. Now they are everywhere. Often they are run by very shady characters and they have added a new dimension to a football 'culture' that was already more tainted than most.

Comment by Coral 2011-12-13 13:55:46

Isn't this what happened in Finland with their African players who were brought over and were not really being paid and then were threatened by their owner that they had to fix games?

Comment by kreig303 2011-12-13 14:35:58

"an explanation — not an excuse"? I thought I was the only one who said that. :-)

Comment by The Purple Cow 2011-12-13 14:49:53

A similar process has happened in cricket. Put yourself in Mohammed Amir's shoes. As the best young new-ball bowler in the world he earned a princely $1500 p/m. from the PCB. So he had to stand by and watch while inferior Indian bowlers like Ishant Sharma (a bowler not fit to tie Amir's bootlaces) raked in north of $4 million per year.

Again, an explanation not an excuse.

Comment by Lincoln 2011-12-13 16:28:06

If anyone has seen the goal scored by the lowest ranked team in the world (whose name escapes me) to win their first game, I think they may also ponder on the chance there was a scam going on.

Comment by JimDavis 2011-12-13 20:00:43

Oh my, to think that for years I thought (before our slow climb to Prem mid table) West Brom players were just crap. Are you saying there is a case to be made that they (along with all "rubbish" players) were actually really as good as we thought when they were brought and just on the take?

Comment by Jongudmund 2011-12-15 13:17:42

"Nobody knows better than fans when their team is not playing to its capabilities."

Mr Plenderleith, you are a fine comedian. That line is pure gold when you compare it to the mad expectations of most fans.

Related articles

Hopes for 2018 ~ part one
Embed from Getty Images // A failed World Cup, underdogs having their day and free drinks during VAR decisions – WSC contributors on what...
The best and worst moments of 2017 ~ part two
Embed from Getty Images // From Lincoln’s triumphant season to Huddersfield’s heart-warming promotion, via Chelsea’s return to...
The Fall Of The House Of FIFA by David Conn
Yellow Jersey Press, £16.99Reviewed by Jon Driscoll From WSC 367, September 2017Buy the book I doubt you would enjoy reading David Conn&...