19 January ~ Nothing better sums up the total shambles that has been West Ham this past week than the statement the club released on Tuesday. In their first official communication since a senior member of the board took it upon themselves to brief the media that Avram Grant would be replaced by Martin O'Neill on Saturday evening, the short statement began with two paragraphs defending Karren Brady, followed by one sentence explaining that Grant was staying on.

Yet another humiliation for a man who has been so badly treated these past couple of months. And it's more than likely that owners Davids Gold and Sullivan wouldn't have said anything at all had it not been for the fact that Brady was accused by the Daily Mirror of agitating for Grant's removal by texting the club's senior players. It was a sorry end to a demeaning saga which has left the club looking like a laughing stock.

It has also left many West Ham fans in the strange position of supporting a manager who in all likelihood will get the club relegated. And, if this happens, Gold, Sullivan and Brady will be as much to blame as Grant himself. Grant's appointment was never universally popular among West Ham fans and one win by late November suggested that the former Portsmouth manager was not up to the job.

Indeed, if the owners had held their hands up at that point and admitted they'd got it wrong very few people would have argued with the decision to axe Grant. Instead they dithered. They did not make the decision to sack Grant, but neither did they make the decision to give him their full backing. And it's this half-baked solution which directly led to this week's events.

First there was points targets, each helpfully leaked to the media. Seven points from four games we were told, then six from three. Each time Grant came just close enough to meeting them to save himself. Then Brady used her column in the Sun to explain why she had blocked the signing of Steve Sidwell. Her argument, that the club already had too many midfielders, was sound but the decision to air it in public rightly infuriated Grant.

A dismal 5-0 defeat at Newcastle at the start of the year finally made the board act and it appears that Martin O'Neill had been persuaded to join. But again the board got it wrong. They started shouting about it before a deal had been completed with the Ulsterman and O'Neill suddenly had second thoughts. He backed out and Gold and Sullivan were suddenly back to square one – only this time with a manager emboldened, players disgusted and fans bemused.

With just a couple of weeks left in the transfer window the owners will now have to put their hands in their pockets and spend their money on players wanted by a manager they clearly don't rate. They then have to hope he somehow manages to inspire his side to put a run together which would move them clear of the relegation zone.

If they don't, not only could it spell relegation but it could also have serious repercussions in their ultimate dream to move to the Olympic Stadium. And if that goes wrong they will only have themselves to blame. Mark Segal

Comments (4)
Comment by Red Adder 2011-01-19 12:06:27

I always find it funny that Sugar seems to rate Brady as a manager - on the apprentice she comes over as trite and light-weight - this confirms it to me.

Comment by eighteen85 2011-01-19 12:36:50

Unlike those at board level at West Ham, Avram Grant seems to be a decent man.

And it's always good to see the two-faced Mrs Peschisolido copping flak - how we Luton fans loved her whinging about lead-swinging players at Birmingham City at the same time as her bone-idle husband was drawing a wage every week from in-administration Luton Town for doing the square root of bugger all due to some alleged injury.

Comment by potts4 2011-01-20 14:51:58

The sympathy i feel is a little over the top for Grant. He has previous in all these kind of shenanigans.

As director of football at both Chelsea and Portsmouth he moved into the managers job after sackings. Are we to say Grant knew nothing of the potential sackings of Jose Mourinho and Paul Hart? I'd hazard a guess at he did.

The difference in this case is that it was leaked. Far too early. Is this to say that others deserve the same outpouring of sympathy as Grant? Because I am sure Tottenham have done this on many occasions, and we did not see the same sympathy for Ramos, who was treated just as bad.

I also wonder about Grant himself. He has a lot of friends in the press. But his track record suggests that he can steady a ship and not much else. West Ham have shown no improvement under Grant whatsoever.

Lastly, I would suggest the sympathy from West Ham fans is limited. More we are embarrassed by the idiots running our club, who quite clearly cannot keep their mouths shut. I think almost everyone would agree he should go Once again though, due to circumstances, we are stuck with idiots in every department. They are making Scott Duxbury look competent.

Comment by donedmundo 2011-01-21 14:21:38

I am amazed the Martin O'Neill ever contemplated working for this shower. No doubt, once he'd had a good look, he cleared off, double quick. Difficult to think of a more unpleasant bunch. Incompetent too.

Related articles

Old Too Soon, Smart Too Late: My Story by Kieron Dyer
with Oliver Holt Headline, £20Reviewed by Gavin BarberFrom WSC 377, July/August 2018Buy the book Kieron Dyer comes across in these pages as...
Photo of the week ~ Bubbles fill the air at West Ham’s London Stadium
West Ham United 0 Brighton & Hove Albion 3, 20/10/2017, London Stadium, Premier League This photo was taken as part of the Match of the Month...
Would relegation be so bad? Fans of Premier League also-rans stuck in limbo
Embed from Getty Images // The top division’s mid-table teams simply make up the numbers, so terrified of the drop that they refuse to take...