9 December ~ Next Tuesday hundreds of Sheffield Wednesday shareholders are expected to vote away their rights and the value of their shares, leaving the club in the sole hands of Milan Mandaric. That this has mostly provoked feelings of celebration and relief reflects the reality that the club was within days of administration, possibly liquidation. The preceding months of speculation and implausible, occasionally comical, takeover bids mean that this is very much the last chance.

Mandaric has been welcomed as a hero, having apparently cleared the majority of the clubs debts – a deal is said to have been reached with the Co-operative Bank to write off most of the estimated £23 million they are owed. The current board, blamed by many for the club’s plight, will have no further involvement beyond honorary life presidencies, a rather surreal condition of the takeover. Talk on the forums is again of big signings and a return to the Championship and beyond. There has been very little room for questioning – Mandaric is regarded as “successful”, “a football man” and with enough cash to ensure success.

However, from reading the newspapers it’s difficult to find the precise terms of Mandaric’s takeover, most having been happy to reproduce the Press Association release. Has the debt to the Co-op been “written off” or sold to Mandaric? Chances are we will never know, as he is only accountable to his own company, UK Football Investments LLC of Delaware, USA. Is he in for the long term? Experience at both Portsmouth and Leicester suggest not and that he will offload as soon as he can make a decent profit. Finally, the big one – to whom will he sell?

In Pompey’s case he was none too choosy, with catastrophic results. Oddly, many fans see this oligarchic model of club ownership as a positive, which is partially understandable given the internecine warfare of the past few years and the unfortunate experience with football trusts – ours famously backed a takeover bid by Ken Bates without consulting its membership. The belief that running the club should be left to the “professionals” is prevalent, rather like saying that people shouldn’t vote because they aren’t politicians.

So what does the immediate future hold? Given Mandaric’s previous form, manager Alan Irvine has most to worry about. On the pitch we have some decent players, but despite a couple of eye-catching wins performances have been far from convincing. Stability in the boardroom may result in improvement, but automatic promotion this season would be a major surprise. There are still enough concerns both on and off the pitch to believe that we have not seen the back of Wednesday’s troubles. Ken Toft

Comments (6)
Comment by owl21 2010-12-09 14:05:31

Its not that difficult to find the terms of the takeover, I suggest you ask a shareholder. It shouldn't be that difficult, there are thousands of us.
This article is little more than (self-confessedly) uninformed stirring.

Comment by Houdi Elbow 2010-12-09 16:43:37

I am a shareholder and I don't believe the issue regarding the debt to the Co-op has been answered in sufficient detail. If it has been 'written off' then great, but I'd like to see proof. You have accused me of 'stirring' - which parts do you disagree with?

Comment by Lincoln 2010-12-09 17:09:40

Manadaric left Pompey on a good footing, it was later owners that caused the problems. It is the same ridiculous stick Redknapp gets beaten with that because he was once at a club that had financial trouble it must be his fault. Correlation not causation. Leicester seem to be doing very nicely out of it as well.
Sure he changes the manager often, but rather than listening to the LMA and ex player punit rhetoric about giving a manager time etc it didn't do either clubs too much harm. As has been said in WSC before, a timely change of manager is not always a bad thing.

Comment by Houdi Elbow 2010-12-10 08:36:12

He sold to Alexandre Gaydamak which is a point I was making. There is plenty in the public domain to cast doubts on Harry Redknapp. Regarding managers, I don't believe that Irvine has the ability to win promotion and wouldn't be sorry to see him leave (which I'm sure he will), but Mandaric's reputation might make some people think twice about working for him.

Comment by Lincoln 2010-12-10 14:05:18

Our views differ then as I don't believe that the selling chairman needs to introduce a personal fit and propper person check.

Comment by Sport Economist 2010-12-12 14:33:10

Wednesday fans cannot afford to stick their heads in the sand about this. True, the Mandaric deal may end up being straight up but it's vague at the moment for sure - so Ken is quite right to raise questions. I have raised a few more in this post, more out of a spirit of inquiry because the facts differ depending on which source on reads. Everyone is willing Wednedsday to return as a force in the game.

Tuesday's "rubber stamping" of the terms should be analyzed with a critical eye and if they are watertight, then fine - but nobody should presume that everything is cushty.

Related articles

It Is What It Is: The Carlton Palmer story
by Carlton Palmer with Steven JacobiVertical Editions, £17.99Reviewed by Andy HockleyFrom WSC 378, September 2018Buy the book As a...
How defender Paul Warhurst (briefly) became the country's most fearsome striker
In the early 1990s an unassuming defender was transformed into the hottest forward in England, firing his team to two cup finals before a...
Sheffield Wednesday manager Carlos Carvalhal assaults £20 note
Here’s Carvalhal screwing up a £20 note to show that the value remains the same despite a battering #swfc— Chris...