Gangster Octopus wrote:
tied up in knots wrote:
the corrupt local Labour party
Details?
Dennis McShane certainly was, but that doesn't necessarily mean
anyone else in the local party was, so I suppose there's a fair chance I might be jumping the gun there. I retract unless it's proved otherwise.
If the details the foster parents gave are proved to be correct there's elements of
that story which certainly might be considered to have a certain level of corruption which wouldn't reflect well on individuals or even the local Labour party as a whole.
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Some of them ought to split from the Labour party and try and get some opposition going.
That happened in Tower Hamlets and didn't get very kind media treatment.
That's interesting. Especially with some of the internal Labour politics in Bristol presently (Bristol Labour refusing, then agreeing, then refusing to join the new independent mayors cabinet, then the leader of Bristol Labour councillors resigning his position). Would you have a decent link to your story?, and as obvious a question as this might seem, why do
you think it didn't get very kind treatment?
E10 Rifle wrote:
Nowhere near that proportion of Labour on here either
Agree, many more independents, but left-leaning independents. I'm not experienced enough on here to make serious judgements about the political demographic of regular OTF contributors. But if I was to spilt it in broad strokes. It would be;
80% Labour/Democrat/Liberal/Socialist/Marxist/Commie/Left/"Progressive"
10% Independent (leaning towards above)
6% Independent
2% Independent (leaning towards below)
2% Conservative/Republican/Right
With a 2% margin of error.