IDS is invoking Beveridge today. Beveridge down the pub, I presume.
Duncan Smith said that families living on benefits, and very wealthy families, were more likely to have large numbers of children than families on average incomes. That was because families on average incomes had to decide how many children they could afford, he said. Families living on benefits should be forced to make the same decisions, he said.
I have no idea what this is on about. Child benefit is a universal rate, isn't it? So is there some reference to tax credits. In which case the family are on in work benefits.
Or is he talking rubbish?