Rogin the Kitten Minder wrote:
Man U go further into debt to buy one of their main rival's best players (again) and it's City who get the "bought the title" jibes, I see ...
Still, Man City now out to 2-1 to afford to buy it again, at Willy Hills. I might have a bit of that. There's a way to go this season yet. Maybe they'll buy Stevie G in the transfer window and he'll finally get a Premier winners' medal. Stranger things have happened.
Arsenal could hardly have been considered "title rivals", and most of the United fans on here argued it was a £24m waste of money, when other areas of the squad more urgently required strengthening. The more pertinent question is why City have failed to build a Chelsea-level legacy, abjectly failing in Europe, and underachieving domestically.