Harry Grindell Matthews wrote:
ESPN certainly didn't, at one point the commentator said it was a "delicious" prospect for Wimbledon.
The fact that ESPN included Wimbledon folk in the broadcast team but no York representation, and the general press-box frenzy over it I think show precisely where the media stand here - they're desperate for the nightmare tie.
As for the game? Meh, bit of a disappointment. With the chances City had, Wimbledon should have been dead and buried by half-time, and even a man short we still managed to be on top for decent periods. No complaints though - if you miss so many easy chances you don't deserve to win. Best of luck to Wimbledon in the next round, let's hope it's against Cambridge.