Preposterous polyester: new kits for 2012/13

HOME

MESSAGE BOARD

Message Board

Welcome, Guest

Message Board

One Touch Football

Football

Preposterous polyester: new kits for 2012/13

(1 viewing) (1) Guest

Reply Thread

New Thread

Page:
1
...
29
30
31
32
33
...
54

TOPIC: Preposterous polyester: new kits for 2012/13

#678974

Stumpy Pepys He doesn't do bylines Posts: 6737	posted 16-06-2012 22:47 Sam Kelly wrote: If the rumoured Liverpool third kit turns out IN ITS ENTIRETY to be true, then it kicks the shit out of their change strip. Too many Photoshop artefacts.
	Last Edit: 16-06-2012 22:50:47 by Stumpy Pepys. Reply Quote

#678978

Stumpy Pepys He doesn't do bylines Posts: 6737	posted 16-06-2012 22:55 Although maybe Rafa Benitez has been doing the online Photoshop tutorials. His first effort being Select Color and Fill.
	Reply Quote

#679369

imp No Platform For Franchism Posts: 1988	posted 17-06-2012 23:06 Dammit if I'm not a bladdy maverick, but I actually quite like that new Man. United home shirt. Now do come and have a verbal go if you think you're rhetorically hard enough.
	Reply Quote

#679375

Jobi1 Keep off the grass Posts: 503	posted 17-06-2012 23:29 Young Andrea models the new Juventus away kit (which to me somehow looks more like a rugby kit) with a not so subtle "30 sul campo" under the badge, referring to the fact they've won 30 championships on the park, honest, guv...
	Reply Quote

#680100

ytseliam Posts: 34	posted 19-06-2012 14:16 hobbes wrote: Well, after rolling out a really decent home shirt, Warrior have blown it with a ludicrous away number. Has Steven Gerrard graduated?
	Reply Quote

#680656

evilC ignore poster function enabled Posts: 10549	posted 20-06-2012 17:47 hobbes wrote: Well, after rolling out a really decent home shirt, Warrior have blown it with a ludicrous away number. - Hmmm... -
	Reply Quote

#680658

Renart Klinsmannschaft! Posts: 5994	posted 20-06-2012 17:48 Ha ha!
	Reply Quote

#680713

Diable Rouge Every silver lining has a cloud Posts: 4441	posted 20-06-2012 21:22 imp wrote: Dammit if I'm not a bladdy maverick, but I actually quite like that new Man. United home shirt. Now do come and have a verbal go if you think you're rhetorically hard enough. Whoever first called it a tablecloth here, agree 100%.
	Reply Quote

#680715

Sean of the Shed Evans and Octopus, sitting in a tree... Posts: 8254	posted 20-06-2012 21:33 Stumpy Pepys wrote: When the new Bolton kit comes out, can the person who posts it PM me first? I need to be prepared in advance, after the skull-crushing horror of the last three Reebok kits. The PM has been sent, and here it is:
	Reply Quote

#680718

Stumpy Pepys He doesn't do bylines Posts: 6737	posted 20-06-2012 21:41 Thanks SotS. Bit plain, but really not bad at all. Unfortunately there's not much Adidas can do about 188-BET. Still too big and too orange.
	Reply Quote

#680720

Sean of the Shed Evans and Octopus, sitting in a tree... Posts: 8254	posted 20-06-2012 21:45 To be fair, anything would have been an improvement on last season's effort.
	Reply Quote

#680743

Harry Truscott Posts: 15659	posted 20-06-2012 22:29 How many times have the worst kit of the season caused relegation now? Bolton last season and Swindon recently at least, no?
	Reply Quote

#680749

Jimmy Bignutz Posts: 3970	posted 20-06-2012 22:41 The angle of the pictures means that the crucial adidasness of the kit isn't clear, so it's hard to judge. Horrible sponsor's logo though.
	Reply Quote

#680761

Kettle
Live everyday, people. Live every fucking day.
Posts: 955

posted 20-06-2012 23:29

Love the shorts. The three stripes should have been blue on the shirt. The sponsor? Yeah, can't do much other than ask they change that gaudy orange to blue. Or find someone less tacky.

But critical of how the shirt looks is far lower down the pecking order than, you know, the football side of things. But, as Jerry Seinfeld once said, sports fandom is nothing more than cheering jerseys....

Reply Quote

#680767

Sam Posts: 5608	posted 21-06-2012 00:02 Jimmy Bignutz wrote: The angle of the pictures means that the crucial adidasness of the kit isn't clear, so it's hard to judge. I can make out enough to see that the stripes are cut short rather than running all the way down the arms. I'd agree with what Kettle's said about the stripes needing to be blue, too.
	Reply Quote

#680811

Harry Truscott Posts: 15659	posted 21-06-2012 09:25 Kettlist Kharkiv wrote: But critical of how the shirt looks is far lower down the pecking order than, you know, the football side of things What?!
	Reply Quote

#681274

Sam Posts: 5608	posted 22-06-2012 04:25 Beltrano Carpinteiro wrote: Kettlist Kharkiv wrote: But critical of how the shirt looks is far lower down the pecking order than, you know, the football side of things What?! Actually, I thought this as well.
	Reply Quote

#681368

jw le boycoutt Posts: 3846	posted 22-06-2012 12:33 Bloody love that Juventus shirt, if only the sponsor was white-on-black (or black-on-black).
	Reply Quote

#681387

koache Posts: 3	posted 22-06-2012 13:05 New Scarborough Athletic kit. Our Black Death Vodka days of getting a shirt ban are , sadly , long gone. store.scarboroughathletic.com/product/re...offer-adult.413.html
	Last Edit: 22-06-2012 13:08:07 by koache. Reply Quote

#681493

JM Footzee Posts: 272	posted 22-06-2012 16:09 Watford to be sponsored by "The Happy Egg" next season:
	Reply Quote

Reply Thread

New Thread

Page:
1
...
29
30
31
32
33
...
54

Time to create page: 0.25 seconds

New on WSC

Sign up for the WSC Weekly Howl

Message Board

TOPIC: Preposterous polyester: new kits for 2012/13

First name
Surname
Email