WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow July 2008 arrow Crystal Palace count the cost
Crystal Palace count the cost

ImageWednesday 9 July ~

There's lot happening at Selhurst Park at the moment. Unfortunately for Crystal Palace fans both current stories about their club involve losing young and highly rated footballers. It is usually difficult to agree, much less sympathise, with chairman Simon Jordan but in the case of 16-year-old John Bostock it's possible to do both. Failing to agree on a fee with Spurs for Palace's youngest-ever player and England Under-17 captain, the matter was taken to Football League arbitration. While Palace asked for an initial £2 million, rising by a further £2.5m dependant on appearances, the tribunal decided on an initial £700,000 rising to £1.25m.

Jordan reacted strongly and though at times his language (“I feel mugged and brutalised”) was a little over-emotive he was right. A dangerous pattern and precedent has been established, giving an even greater advantage to big clubs. John Bostock is rated as of the best teenage footballers in the country and Palace had rejected a £900,000 offer from Chelsea when the player was only 14. Jordan railed on behalf of his own club: “I have an academy who have produced a world-class footballer for someone else and got paid two-and-sixpence for it... The most disappointing thing is we had a player we nourished and cherished for nine years... It was John Bostock’s year next season at Palace and we weren’t going to sign central midfielders because we wanted to clear a path for him.” But he also questioned the tribunal's effect on youth development as a whole: “I don’t feel it sends out a good message to people who pump millions into youth development. And what’s going to happen to our young players when they are stockpiled in the butter mountains of the Tottenhams and Chelseas of this world?”

The news that a second young player may leave Palace this week was not announced through traditional media but in modern style (Facebook) and in particularly contemporary language by the player himself. Ashley-Paul Robinson, “Motor Mouth” to his friends, revealed his trial with Fulham not to his 198 personal contacts but to the 2.7m strong London network. Over the weekend, the winger, referring to himself in third person, boasted: “Ashley-Paul is goin fulham on Monday. If I pull dis off im on dis ting!!!” The following day, he added: “Ashley-Paul is off to Bath With Fulham. Fingers Crossed.” Obviously fans of the two London clubs involved were quick to spread this news so by Monday the 19-year-old was forced to admit: “Ashley-Paul has been very naughty lol!”

Palace fans reacted with a mixture of disappointment at losing another academy product, who had already been promised a new contract, and anger at the player's attitude whereas Fulham supporters had a subdued reaction, mostly concerned with Ashley-Paul Robinson's loyalty and command of English. If the Fulham move goes ahead Palace would be due a substantial fee for the player as he is under 23 years old. Simon Jordan may well have another tribunal to attend.

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong
Comments (4)
Comment by Kowalski 09-07-2008 19:34    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

You can only refer to yourself in the third person in your Facebook status

Comment by Toozer 10-07-2008 13:09    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Visit http://forums.cpfc.org/showthr...number=192 for Palace fans' views on this sorry saga.

The FA will doubtless wring their hands and say it's UEFA's fault; yet they encourage clubs to start up Academies, then declare the fruits of their labours are pretty much worthless.

Don't blame Spurs as such - blame the system, and blame the FA.
Independent Body of Football Governance needed now!

Comment by Quagmire 10-07-2008 15:17    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

I don't think Simon Jordan is as unpopular with neutral supporters as the media often imply. His only crime, it seems to me, is to be outspoken which actually isn't much of a crime when you consider 99% of the time he's bang on the money with what he says.

Comment by Steve Saint 12-07-2008 06:38    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

3.5 years ago Southampton were in the same position when we sold Theo Walcott to Arsenal. The difference was that Rupert Lowe made sure we got a decent wedge for him- over all 10 times what Palace will get for Bostock. Last year we sold Gareth Bale, again making sure we got a decent amount of money for him.

Palace fans should feel short-changed, you need a chairman who's better at negotiations with the greedy Premier League clubs.

Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

The first time Going to a live match   

Josh Widdicombe   

WSC 270 Aug 09

Paul Brooker The new Giggs   

Adam Powley   

WSC 182 Apr 02

Another fine mess England try to find a new coach   

WSC   

WSC 232 Jun 06

Pools unto themselves History of the Pools Panel   

Al Needham   

WSC 193 Mar 03

Leyton Orient's North Terrace A tribute   

Tom Davies   

WSC 194 Apr 03

WSC digital edition & apps    

   

 

Keith O'Neill World is his lobster   

Dave Hannigan   

WSC 207 May 04

Exit clause England's World Cup 2006   

WSC   

WSC 234 Aug 06

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

Death of a salesman Les Sealey tribute   

John Earls   

WSC 176 Oct 01