WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow May 2008 arrow Palace theatre
Palace theatre

ImageSaturday 10 May ~

Whatever happens to Crystal Palace in the Championship play-offs, you can be sure that Neil Warnock will have plenty to say about it. Much of his post-match comments, either after the sem-final against Bristol City or the final at Wembley, will revolve around the fact that he knows many people don't like him but, guess what, he doesn't care. This outlook is also useful to him in firing up his teams. Whatever he does, it seems to work.

Palace began the season under the management of Peter Taylor, a man fated to be seen always as a promising youngster destined for big things, despite being in his mid-50s. When Warnock took over in early October the club were just above the relegation area in the Championship. Palace's loud chairman, Simon Jordan, is prone to public declarations about the high standards he expects from his employees and he has reason to be delighted with Warnock, who has done an extremely good job over the past seven months. A 15-game unbeaten run from October to January took a previously struggling team into play-off contention.

Should Palace win promotion, they will need break with an unwanted club tradition. Steve Coppell's side went down from the Premier League in its inaugural season, 1992-93, having finished third two years earlier. Since then, Palace have been promoted back three times but always relegated the following season. Warnock has an unhappy record in this respect having also gone down immediately with the other two teams he took up to the top level, Notts County and Sheffield United.

That first relegation under Coppell ended the longest run that the club have ever had in the top division, just five seasons. While many chairmen like to talk airily of their club's potential fanbase, in Palace's case there is a case to be made. They have a large catchment area in south London, in which they have usually been in competition with Chelsea. But they ought to be able to at least rival West Ham as fourth London club if only they could gain a proper foothold. Their current owner-manager combination does mean, however, that they won't feature highly in the affections of many neutrals. Then again, Neil Warnock is probably saying as much right now as he prepares to unleash his team on Bristol City.

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong
Comments (1)
Comment by Pan Tau 11-05-2008 09:03    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Ah, when you attached a quality of certainty to the nature of Warnock's post-match interview you surrendered your claim to prescience. But you pretty much got it spot on. Neil was not surprised that ref decisions went against him. Much as I'd like to see Hill or Bristol City in the Premier League, if Palace do get promoted there'll be the upshot of receiving wider exposure of Warnock's shtick. And isn't football all about the entertainment value?

Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Lothar Matthäus Great player, terrible manager   

Paul Joyce   

WSC 248 Oct 07

Jay Bothroyd Not a fan favourite    

Neville Hadsley   

WSC 199 Sep 03

Secret agents Agency shareholders   

Extract   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Empty arms The shadow of the Millennium Stadium    

Andrew Turton    

WSC 146 Apr 99

Celebrity columns Crass offerings   

Ian Plenderleith   

WSC 161 Jul 00

We don't talk any more Problems for the Dutch   

Simon Kuper   

WSC 114 Aug 96

Northern Ireland 3 Belgium 0 The David Stewart mystery   

Davy Millar   

WSC 141 Nov 98

Tokyo pose 1981 World Club Cup   

Cris Freddi   

WSC 176 Oct 01

Steve Marlet Fulham's overpriced French import   

James Eastham   

WSC 270 Aug 09

USA Mexico comes to Los Angeles   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 213 Nov 04