THE ARCHIVE
Miscellaneous
For better, for worse | For better, for worse |
|
Just over this short summer, several individual events or trends have been declared “good for the game” by journalists, managers, bloggers and FIFA presidents. Sepp Blatter used the phrase to describe Real Madrid’s surely booze-fuelled spending binge. In the British press, a series of journalists running on empty queued up to declare that John Terry’s transfer to Manchester City, if it actually happened, would be “good for the game”. Elsewhere it was ventured that a second powerful spending force in Manchester would benefit pretty much everyone in the living world. It is all very well bandying this phrase about when your editor requires a 500-word opinion piece by lunchtime but it doesn’t appear that anyone has done a scientifically applied cost-benefit analysis on the subjects. Here, three arguable propositions are measured in brutally clinical conditions in order to determine whether they are, empirically speaking, actually good for the game. 1. Manchester City become a major force in Premier League Benefit Here, the benefits to the game and its adherents are obvious. The affected indifference of Manchester United fans to City’s unstoppable march up the table, thanks to their expensive and viciously rotating forwards, will be a joy to behold for the neutral. And City will rise up the table because they reached tenth last season with 50 points, after spending £32 million on Robinho alone, while the season before that they only came ninth with 55 points and, oh no, that doesn’t really bear close scrutiny. Brilliantly, though, Manchester United fans will be heard theorising that one cannot buy a great team (as United and Chelsea have), while everyone is aware, of course, that one can. One certainly cannot borrow a great team or land four world-class strikers with a cheeky bid on eBay. From WSC 271 September 2009 On the subject...
Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| «Previous | | | Next» |
|---|
Today's most read WSC articles
Empty arms The shadow of the Millennium Stadium |
Andrew Turton |
WSC 146 Apr 99 |
Jay Bothroyd Not a fan favourite |
Neville Hadsley |
WSC 199 Sep 03 |
Lothar Matthäus Great player, terrible manager |
Paul Joyce |
WSC 248 Oct 07 |
Secret agents Agency shareholders |
Extract |
WSC 194 Apr 03 |
We don't talk any more Problems for the Dutch |
Simon Kuper |
WSC 114 Aug 96 |
Tokyo pose 1981 World Club Cup |
Cris Freddi |
WSC 176 Oct 01 |
Northern Ireland 3 Belgium 0 The David Stewart mystery |
Davy Millar |
WSC 141 Nov 98 |
Steve Marlet Fulham's overpriced French import |
James Eastham |
WSC 270 Aug 09 |
Celebrity columns Crass offerings |
Ian Plenderleith |
WSC 161 Jul 00 |
Unique selling point Hooliganism back in the news |
WSC |
WSC 272 Oct 09 |







Subscribe to this comment's feed