WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow March 2010 arrow Cambridge United fans race against time
Cambridge United fans race against time

Image 11 March ~ A number of clubs in the English pyramid do not hold ownership of their home grounds, much to the anxiety of their supporters. One such club is Cambridge United. Faced with considerable financial difficulties, their Abbey Stadium ground was sold to Bideawhile 445, the company of then-director John Howard, to help pay off debts in 2004. Yet an imaginative scheme currently underway suggests that there are hopes in CB5 that the ground may be about to be bought back.

The club is considerably hampered by having to pay rent for the ground they no longer own, with £240,000 per year due to Bideawhile and subject to future increases. For any club this is a hefty sum to have to make up in addition to the annual playing budget, but even more so for a club who receives no television income and no FA funding for the running of their youth system.

Bideawhile have now accepted an offer from local property developer Grosvenor Estates for the ground, alerting U's supporters to a clause from the original sale which allows the club a legal right to repurchase the ground for the same fee agreed with the new buyer. There is only a limited time frame in which this clause remains valid and the club has a mere two more weeks before that deadline passes. The largest stumbling block is the fee itself – £3.5million. No bucket collection would even make a dent upon this figure, so Cambridge Fans United (CFU) has launched a campaign to raise all of the money in the time required. The proposal is to form a Community Interest Company (CIC) and sell 3,500 shares for £1,000 each to make up the value of the ground, before leasing the stadium to the football club.

By non-League standards, the U's are a very well supported side with over 2,000 season-ticket holders but the campaign needs to reach beyond their fanbase for this scheme to be successful. Rather than giving the ground back to the club, the CIC would still charge a rent to the club, speculatively set at £140,000 per year, which would be split up and divided among the investors. It is hoped that this will attract benefactors who may not be football fans but able to spot the benefits of making a return from their input. The benefit to the football club is clear to see, a considerably reduced rent and friendly landlords who can be counted on not to leave the club in future peril. If the rent is indeed agreed at £140,000 this represents a six-figure annual saving on the fee that would otherwise be payable to their new landlords, which makes up a large amount of the club's annual turnover.

CFU chairman Dave Matthew-Jones noted in a press release this week that: "Since 2004 Cambridge United has never had the chance to be a proper football club: the cost of not having control of our ground isn't just a financial one. It means the whole community loses out as we can't provide the sporting hub that our town so desperately deserves." CFU has a race against time to bring this plan to fruition but if it comes off the U's can look forward to a brighter future. Matt Ramsay

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong

On the subject...

Comments (2)
Comment by mightymoose 12-03-2010 15:41    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

As a U's fan I'm all for this but even £1k each is still a stretch for me. Fingers crossed

Comment by diem 14-03-2010 11:03    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Good luck - an innovative scheme, much more interesting than the usual "share ownership" ventures, where you see little in return.

In light of the comment above, one wonders whether 7,000 shares at £500 each would be more practical, or even 14,000 x £250. On the other hand, maybe people will stump up for one share only, rather than seeing it as a monetary investment...?

Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

The domination game Praising Chelsea   

WSC   

WSC 217 Mar 05

Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown   

Darron Kirkby   

WSC 223 Sep 05

Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two   

Steve Ragg   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Major success? MLS's first season   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 118 Dec 96

Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 145 Mar 99

States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup   

Ethan Zindler   

WSC 151 Sep 99

Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money?   

Jonathan Barnes   

WSC 221 Jul 05

Plymouth Argyle Underachievement, kits and rivals   

Rob Synnott   

WSC 183 May 02

Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland   

Dianne Millen   

WSC 206 Apr 04

Andy Goram Still standing between the sticks   

Dan Brennan   

WSC 203 Jan 04