WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow February 2010 arrow West Ham's Olympic ambition
West Ham's Olympic ambition

Image 17 February ~ In a little over two and a half years the £500 million, 80,000-capacity Olympic stadium in East London will stand empty, having hosted the main event followed by the Paralympic Games. By then the future of the costly venue will need to have been decided. Some argue the key to this is the presence of at least one permanent tenant. This may yet be West Ham United.

When they took over the Hammers last month, David Sullivan and David Gold announced that they were backing a move three miles away to Stratford, the site of the Olympic Village and stadium. This plan has been challenged, however, by those currently in control of the site. Sullivan says that West Ham have over £100m worth of debt, with excessive running costs having led to a £37m loss in 2007-08. To alleviate this the proposal is that Upton Park, the club's home since 1904, is sold and the Olympic venue rented. Their current ground is valued at around £77m – selling would trim the debt and help cover their share of the move's associated costs.

Such a move would mirror other post-Olympic tenancies such as Panathinaikos and AEK Athens in Greece, Espanyol in Barcelona and Bayern and 1860 in Munich. Of these only AEK will remain at any of those venues following this season. The others are relocating to purpose-built, athletics track-free stadiums. It is largely accepted that the presence of a track hinders the view of spectators and consequently has an adverse affect on atmosphere. Sullivan has said that the Stratford track would have to be removed, as was the case at Manchester City's Eastlands following the 2002 Commonwealth Games.

Meanwhile, Sebastian Coe and his organising team insist there must be an athletics legacy. "It's non-negotiable that this is a track and field facility," he said. A compromise would be for retractable seating that covers the track, as used at the Stade de France, which would be moved in or out depending on the event. Though this would add greater cost to an already expensive project. Another proposal is that the top tier of seating is removed following the Games, leaving a reduced 25,000-capacity bowl suitable for athletic events and a tenant who would draw smaller crowds – Leyton Orient and Wasps or Saracens rugby clubs have been mooted in the past.

However, support for a larger, 55,000-capacity venue is growing with the England 2018 World Cup bid team, which has listed the stadium as a possible host venue, among those in favour. Should the stadium continue to stage athletics after 2012, then West Ham or any other tenant would have to compromise if they want to move in. But the greater capacity and resulting revenues may come to seem like a reasonable trade off for the inconvenience of a surrounding track. Tom Whitworth

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong
Comments (2)
Comment by fieryelephant 18-02-2010 07:44    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Can't see spectator inconvenience getting in the way if it's a money-spinner. In Melbourne the government are putting the final touches to a 30,000 "soccer" stadium they've built. However, Victory, the city's principle team, want to continue to play half their games in an Australian rules stadium (the equivilant of having two or three running tracks). They claim the new stadium isn't big enough, despite not topping 30,000 all season - seems they've just been offered cheaper rent...

Comment by Dalef65 19-02-2010 18:02    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Loads of arguments on both or all sides(no pun intented) of this debate......
But I do think that playing regular English league football in a stadium with an athletics track surrounding the pitch would be farcical.
We have had this situation at Brighton for the past few years,and all we can do is make the best of a bad job till we get a new ground.
Premier League football at an atmosphere-free athletics stadium?
I think not...............

Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Kenny Achampong Tricky midfielder who disappeared   

Tom Davies   

WSC 179 Jan 02

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

There or thereabouts Keith Alexander obituary   

Rob Bradley   

WSC 278 Apr 10

WSC digital edition & apps    

   

 

Age of chance The lack of young English talent   

Gavin Willacy   

WSC 248 Oct 07

Oceania's eleven Solomons shock   

Matthew Hall   

WSC 210 Aug 04

Bury No money, more worry   

Chris Bainbridge   

WSC 207 May 04

Burnt at the stakes Betting on the Euros   

David Bendelow   

WSC 210 Aug 04

War of words Rupert Lowe's victory over the Times   

Neil Rose   

WSC 228 Feb 06

Unreasonable force Heavy policing in Portugal   

Adam Brown   

WSC 123 May 97