WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

cravebutton_ROS

Getting shirty

shirt


Notable kits of yesteryear
From the Weekly Howl. Sign up here

Archive by year

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

2006 2007

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

NEWSFEEDS

classicfootballshirts
cultzeros
HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow November 2009 arrow The success of World Cup expansion
The success of World Cup expansion

Image 23 November 2009 ~ Is the World Cup running out of countries? Next year's tournament has already notched a statistical quirk – it will be the first World Cup in which no country makes its finals debut. Slovakia have qualified in their own right for the first time, but given Czechoslovakia's rich contribution from the earliest years of the World Cup, that hardly ranks as an expansion of the tournament's boundaries. (For the ultimate pedants Serbia are also new, having separated from Montenegro since 2006.)

Between 70 and 80 countries have competed in the finals – the exact number depends on how you count the constituent parts of the former Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia, and the two (or possibly three) Germanys. More than one in three (27 countries) appeared before the Second World War. Since then the accumulation has been steady, ranging from just one addition (England in 1950) to five (1982), or seven if you count Ukraine and Serbia (not forgetting Montenegro) in 2006.

Most recent additions, not surprisingly, have come with the expansion of the tournament to 24 teams in 1982 and then 32 in 1998, and have been predominantly from the main beneficiaries of that process: Africa, Asia, Central America and the Caribbean. Despite the reservations of some at the time and the persistence of one glaring inequality in the demands of qualifying (Oceania), World Cup expansion has been a resounding success. True, participation numbers have not always translated into a similar variety of the teams competing in the later knockout stages. But the "world" in World Cup no longer refers only to those who watch it. Most people in the world can have a realistic expectation that their country will take part in the finals. If Togo and Slovenia can do it, who cannot nurture hope?

We should hope that 2010 is only a blip in the extension of the World Cup to further corners, though the number of plausible candidates is finite. In South America only Venezuela are yet to make it. Europe may conceivably offer Finland or Cyprus, Bosnia and more former Soviet republics. But there are still plenty of possibilities in Africa, where countries with some Cup of Nations pedigree, such as Zambia, Mali and Burkina Faso, are waiting. And the perennial Asian qualifiers should be challenged soon by cashed-up gulf states such as Bahrain and Qatar. The last big untapped zone is south and south-east Asia, where India and Indonesia offer vast TV markets as well as neat global symmetry, though Thailand and Vietnam are more plausible qualifiers in the medium term.

For 2010, fans searching for novelty will have to make do with the seven teams coming back for only their second shot – Greece, Slovenia, North Korea, New Zealand, Honduras, Ghana and Ivory Coast. Perhaps the positive side of Africa's failure to produce a new entrant is that their more seasoned teams may finally produce a breakthrough to the knockout stages in numbers. If so, the tournament's global reach will have been extended in an equally satisfying way. Mike Ticher

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong
Comments (4)
Comment by Adsy Wadsy 23-11-2009 17:47    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

"If Togo and Slovenia can do it, who cannot nurture hope?"

Scotland.

Comment by Munchkin 23-11-2009 20:38    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Look at the way FIFA behave.
There's fairly limited evidence to encourage lots of long-standing members being able to get to a World Cup, let alone new ones!

Comment by Jongudmund 24-11-2009 12:40    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

It would be more fun to have it as a genuine world "cup" competition - knock out stages from the off, everyone in the draw together (maybe seed it so bigger nations only come in during the third round?

That would give smaller nations opportunities to play teams from other continents for a change.

Comment by Dalef65 28-11-2009 11:38    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

IM not too sure why African teams producing a breakthrough would be any more positive or satisfying,than say New zealand, Honduras,Paraguay,or North Korea coming through,or South Korea in 2002.Or Indeed England.......!!!
Is the author of the main article an African, or is he being just a little bit PC?
I think it was Pele way back in about 1970 who said something like "An African Country will win the WC before 2000"
Still no sign of that materialising, and indeed some of them like Nigeria and Cameroon have actually gone backwards in recent years.
A better question would be why this is.
After all most of their players play in the "big" leagues now, so can we really still call them "small" countries?
Questions, questions all to be answered in about 7 months time.

Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

A familiar affair? Beckham and Loos   

Barney Ronay   

WSC 208 Jun 04

Leyton Orient 0 Grimsby Town 0 Match of the month   

Tom Davies   

WSC 232 Jun 06

Football’s Comic Book Heroes by Adam Riches   

Frank Plowright   

WSC 271 Sep 09

Hits and misses Football comic publishing   

Frank Plowright   

WSC 206 Apr 04