WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

cravebutton_ROS

Stickipedia

stick


A mine of information constructed from sticker cards
From the Weekly Howl. Sign up here

Archive by year

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

2006 2007

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

NEWSFEEDS

cultzeros
classicfootballshirts
HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow September 2009 arrow Luton's lower-league labours
Luton's lower-league labours

Image Wednesday 30 September ~

As a Luton fan living in the heart of Spurs/Arsenal territory, you get used to being patronised: "Here’s a tenner, buy the club"; "If I came with you, would that double the attendance?"; that kind of thing. So it’s been novel playing the role of big fish in the small pond of the Blue Square Premier, outnumbering the home support at some away games and running sweepstakes on how few fans Gateshead would bring (it was 48 – but their team didn’t deserve to lose).

It has, in truth, engendered a certain arrogance that we should easily be beating the likes of Kettering, Salisbury and Stevenage – after all, the argument goes, we were only relegated last year because of the unjust 30-point deduction, not because we were the worst team in League Two, and the much-respected consortium that now runs the club not only kept all the best players but added a raft of good new ones too over the summer.

This is all true enough, but the reality of life in the BSP has not proven so simple. Though at the start of the season some mouthed the platitude that this is not an easy league to get out of, few really believed it. A strong squad, a relatively big fanbase (8,223 at last night’s home game against Stevenage) and just the fact that we are Luton was seen – and still is seen – to be enough, hence the growing if reluctant calls for Mick Harford’s head.

Kettering, Salisbury and Stevenage, among others, have not done the decent thing and refused to roll over as they were meant to, helped by generally clueless performances from a hideously underperforming Luton team. The quality of opposition has been variable – Crawley, for example, were genuinely outclassed in a way I have not seen before – but in general the other teams have been organised. The main difference between this league and the two above seems to be in the ability to take your chances. It’s no surprise to me that some teams make rapid progression through the lower reaches (look at Doncaster) – the standard is not that different.

Nonetheless, given Luton’s recent history, the belief that we are meant for higher things is hard to shake and I cannot help but feel that this league is there for the taking if only we could play somewhere near our potential – the opposition may be perfectly competent, but it’s not particularly good. All the while, Oxford seem to have finally got the hang of the BSP after three years of being the big fish themselves and have a 13-point lead over us already. I hope it doesn’t take us as long as it’s taken them.

There has been some enjoyment in discovering new grounds, and pictures of Histon’s somewhat small and basic away end have been doing the rounds – although the riot police at Cambridge last Saturday were just a bit over the top, belying the image of how away fan-friendly the BSP is. But our benevolence is on the basis that we’re only going to be visiting them the once, so it’s like a footballing gap year, not a permanent relocation. Much of this inability to cope with the reality of our new status is down to a dizzying freefall that has been hard to comprehend – just three years ago, nearly to the day, we were fifth in the Championship. And that is where most fans think we belong. The harsh truth, however, is that this arrogance belongs to the past.

The one good thing has been to see first-hand the amazing depth of English football. Is there any other country in the world where a fifth-division, non-League match (Oxford v Luton) could attract a crowd of over 10,500? That, at least, is something to be proud of. Neil Rose

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong

On the subject...

Comments (3)
Comment by Martin C 30-09-2009 18:38    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Interesting article and I had not realized either Luton or Oxford had sunk so low. But as for the author's question of another country where 10,000 plus fans would turn out for such lower level play, Spain's Real Oviedo had sunk to the lower levels of that country's football and regularly attracted crowds in excess of 10,000. Real Oviedo are now clawing their way back up and are playing in Spain's regional version of a third division (Segunda B).

Comment by cantagalo 30-09-2009 23:49    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

The average crowd for the 3 home games that Santa Cruz played in Brazil's Serie D this season was 37,000. Unfortunately they didn't win a single one of them and failed to qualify for the next stage. Vasco had a 75,000 crowd for their Serie B game against Ipatinga.

These are exceptions, though. Lower league crowds in Brazil are generally piss poor.

Comment by SydneyToon 01-10-2009 03:37    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Interesting article. I really enjoyed it. I hope Luton come back up the divisions to where they belong. Growing up, they were a top division side and I remember them beating Arsenal in the League Cup Final.

Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

The Pontoon Stand Grimsby's secret weapon   

Tony Butcher   

WSC 188 Oct 02

The trying game Worst ever Premiership?   

Stephen Wagg   

WSC 204 Feb 04

A familiar affair? Beckham and Loos   

Barney Ronay   

WSC 208 Jun 04

Pressed into action Soho Square sex scandal   

WSC   

WSC 211 Sep 04