WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow September 2009 arrow Defending Adebayor
Defending Adebayor

Image Monday 14 September ~

Developing selective vision is an important skill for any football manager. Indeed, the Manager of the Month award should be accompanied by a secondary honour given to the best attempt to downplay a player's transgression. There would no shortage of candidates from every round of matches given that players are routinely described as having "arrived a bit late", or variations on that theme, when nearly cleaving an opponent in two. Mark Hughes would be a shoo-in for September, however, for describing Emmanuel Adebayor as "emotional" after the player's highly controversial performance in Man City's 4-2 defeat of his former club.

Adebayor is likely to receive a ban for stamping on his former team-mate Robin Van Persie – an action that provoked Arsenal into the highly unusual step of posting their player's complaints about the incident on the official club website. Somehow this episode was missed by referee Mark Clattenburg, which frees up the FA to take retrospective action. Some commentators have suggested that Adebayor committed a public order offence for his second transgression, which involved running the length of the pitch to taunt Arsenal fans after scoring. But unless criminal proceedings are brought against him, which seems highly unlikely, he may escape further punishment because he was booked at the time.

Mark Hughes's attempt to excuse his player's behaviour implies that Adebayor lost his head for a moment. In fact, the opposite may be true. It seems more likely that the striker had been intent before the match had even begun on making some sort of gesture to Arsenal fans. In the build-up to the game he made a point of telling the press that he had been "scarred for life" by the barracking he had received from sections of the Arsenal crowd after failing to secure a transfer to either AC Milan or Barcelona last summer; he came in for more concerted abuse from travelling fans during the match on Saturday.

Of course spectators who racially abuse players should be identified and banned. But Adebayor's pre-game posturing was ludicrous, a sign of the bubble of self-absorption that envelops some top players. Indeed, another reason for Adebayor's grievance towards Arsenal has been put forward. His former employers swiftly concluded a deal to sell him to Man City when he was away playing in a World Cup qualifier for Togo – instead of being pursued by several interested parties in Europe he was packed off to Eastlands. A huge payrise will have been some consolation but it's not the move he wanted. City fans can expect to hear plenty more about Adebayor's "emotional" state of mind if his old suitors come calling again next summer. Carl Hawkins

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong
Comments (3)
Comment by Lincoln 14-09-2009 14:13    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

An old, yet fair, 'rule' of football is if you dish it out you have to take it. Somewhere along the way fans lost the ability to take it. If you give someone abuse you can hardly act with indignation when they do something similar back.

Comment by Coxy 14-09-2009 14:20    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Lincoln - too bloody right. players should have a microphone behind the goal so when they score they can give it loads to the opposing fans and manager, it would be a right laugh. The captains should have a one on one interview before the games like they do in Boxing , which is sometimes more interesting than the fight.
City fans get used the witch hunts,don't worry about them , just watch and have fun.

Comment by Lincoln 14-09-2009 17:16    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

I like this. Perhaps there could also be some key pad that each fan get at the start of the game. In the event of a penalty being given, or an offside given when a goal is scored, then the fan is required to press agree or disagree. If they press disagree and it is subsequently proved the ref was right then they lose the right to enter the ground for the season. This could then be extended to TV pundits with the same rules but they aren't allowed to watch it on replays. If they get it wrong they have their contract torn up. If fans and pundits press agree then all is fine and perhaps then they can accept that referees aren't perfect. One of a number of changes necessary, along with your suggestion Coxy, to take the game back from self righteous fans and the like.

Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 145 Mar 99

Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two   

Steve Ragg   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Major success? MLS's first season   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 118 Dec 96

The domination game Praising Chelsea   

WSC   

WSC 217 Mar 05

Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money?   

Jonathan Barnes   

WSC 221 Jul 05

Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown   

Darron Kirkby   

WSC 223 Sep 05

Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland   

Dianne Millen   

WSC 206 Apr 04

States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup   

Ethan Zindler   

WSC 151 Sep 99

Kenny Achampong Tricky midfielder who disappeared   

Tom Davies   

WSC 179 Jan 02

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07