WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow THE ARCHIVE arrow Editorials arrow Limited ambitions
Limited ambitions

Clubs want more power over UEFA

At a time when the Olympics, the Champions League and World Cup qual­ifying matches are all taking place in quick succession, the conflicting demands of clubs and national associations are making headlines once again.

Although it seems unlikely to end in an apocalyptic conflagration, the pressures continue to build to reshape world football on behalf of a small elite of powerful European clubs. Their interest, naturally, is to plug themselves permanently into the cash machine of the Champions League and, if possible, make it flow even more abundantly. The consequences of not doing so are clear for clubs on the fringes of regular involvement such as Chelsea, whose high spending and massive interest burden demand an equally exorbitant income.

To that end, they want (among other things) to restrict the number of international matches played by their increasingly cosmopolitan squads. That means pressurising the players themselves not to join their national teams, as Arsenal did successfully with Kanu and Leeds tried to do with Mark Viduka before the Olympics.

It also means pressurising UEFA to change the rules on player releases and to tinker with the format of the World Cup and European Championship so that smaller countries have to “pre-qualify” for the qualifying groups. Demands that the international calendar be streamlined will intensify as the fragmentation of national associations continues. Greenland, officially part of Denmark, are in the process of applying for UEFA recognition. So too are Catalonia (to be closely followed by the Basque country if they succeed).

The main conduit for the kind of talk is the “G14” group of clubs. (No one knows what the “G” stands for. Greedy?) The G14 has now constituted itself as an “official” body, whatever that means, and is pressing for recognition by UEFA, the European Union and, possibly, the World Bank. “So far UEFA has refused to talk to us officially and that has to change,” said the group’s spokesman Karl-Heinz Rumenigge. “They have to open the door for club football to have its say, especially when it comes to talks about releasing players for international football.”

The G14 is also talking about expanding its membership, possibly to include Arsenal and Chelsea (who, let us remember, only returned to international competition in 1994-95 after an absence of over twenty years). However, there seems to be no talk of dumping some of the group’s less successful members. Which is odd, because even with the absurdly favourable conditions prevailing these days, no fewer than five of the G14 failed to make it to the final group stage of the Champions League this year (Liverpool, Borussia Dortmund, Inter, Ajax and Marseille). Dortmund and Marseille could not even make it into the UEFA Cup, finishing in the bottom half of their leagues.

Yet even within the cabals of the G14, some of the participants seem to be going a bit off-message. Gary Neville is not yet an official spokesman for the group, but his view is that the Champions League should be reduced, with each club playing fewer games. So far, not too controversial – his former chairman Martin Edwards agrees that 13 might be a better number of matches when the next Champions League contracts are negotiated. However, it is hard to imagine any representative from the G14 group agreeing with G Neville that qualification should be restricted to “just the champions of each country and maybe the runners-up”.

“Now that it is getting to the third and fourth team, it’s getting ridiculous,” he said. So ridiculous, of course, that Valencia (fourth in the Spanish league in 1998-99) reached the final of last year’s competition. The ever hopeful Milan, too, would be out of this year’s jamboree if the Neville rule was applied, having finished third in last season’s Serie A.

Although the people who run the G14 might happily reduce the number of teams involved in the lucrative stage of the League, it is of course the likes of Donetsk they want to exclude from it, not the third and fourth placed teams from Spain, Italy, Germany or England.

And if they don’t get their way on these issues, naturally, the G14 are prepared to countenance a breakaway. “As the most successful clubs in football we deserve a bigger voice,” says Rummenigge. Now where have we heard that before?

From WSC 165 November 2000. What was happening this month

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong

On the subject...

Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

The domination game Praising Chelsea   

WSC   

WSC 217 Mar 05

Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown   

Darron Kirkby   

WSC 223 Sep 05

Major success? MLS's first season   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 118 Dec 96

States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup   

Ethan Zindler   

WSC 151 Sep 99

Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 145 Mar 99

Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two   

Steve Ragg   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Plymouth Argyle Underachievement, kits and rivals   

Rob Synnott   

WSC 183 May 02

Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money?   

Jonathan Barnes   

WSC 221 Jul 05

Unreasonable force Heavy policing in Portugal   

Adam Brown   

WSC 123 May 97

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07