THE ARCHIVE
International football
Dutch passport | Dutch passport |
|
Holland have a dastardly way of choosing a manager. It works like this: a few old men at the Dutch FA settle upon some appropriate chap, usually a good club coach, always overlooking the best candidate (Johan Cruyff) on the grounds that he is difficult. This may sound familiar. The only difference with the English procedure is that the Dutch one works. That is because the Dutch have a secret. Holland used to play a slow, passing game that never got them anywhere. By the time they finally qualified for a World Cup, in 1974, Cruyff and Rinus Michels had invented a Dutch style of football. Its secret ingredients can now at last be revealed: a keeper who could play football, overlapping backs, two wingers, and an emphasis on passing and thinking. This style was known in Britain (though never in Holland) as total football. If pressed, the Dutch will call it the Hollandse stijl. Total football took Holland to two World Cup finals, but after 1978 they forgot it. The manager of the early 1980s, Kees Rijvers, wanted to play like Brazil, while the Ajax manager, Aad de Mos, recommended a switch to catenaccio. Holland missed the 1982 and 1986 World Cups. However, half way through 1985, something had changed. Cruyff became manager of Ajax and returned the club to total football (though he never called it that). With the culture set, the identity of the manager is scarcely relevant. Even if it were Keegan he probably couldn’t change much. When he took over England, Keegan was called a “messiah”, but the new Dutch manager never is. His appointment is low-key, like the choice of the Queen’s commissioner for the province of Groningen. Happy is the land that has no need of heroes. Dutch managers do make mistakes, but they all make the same ones. All have picked Frank de Boer. None has liked Hasselbaink. Guus Hiddink’s team of 1998 became Frank Rijkaard’s team in 2000 and, minus Bergkamp, will be Van Gaal’s team in 2002 if Holland qualify. When the Dutch fail, the culture is never questioned. When they lost in Euro 2000, no one said Rijkaard should have picked players with “heart”. Instead, people said he should have sent on Pierre van Hooijdonk as a late sub against Italy. From WSC 166 December 2000. What was happening this month On the subject...
Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| «Previous | | | Next» |
|---|
Today's most read WSC articles
The domination game Praising Chelsea |
WSC |
WSC 217 Mar 05 |
Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown |
Darron Kirkby |
WSC 223 Sep 05 |
Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development |
Mike Woitalla |
WSC 145 Mar 99 |
Major success? MLS's first season |
Mike Woitalla |
WSC 118 Dec 96 |
Unreasonable force Heavy policing in Portugal |
Adam Brown |
WSC 123 May 97 |
States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup |
Ethan Zindler |
WSC 151 Sep 99 |
Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money? |
Jonathan Barnes |
WSC 221 Jul 05 |
No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography |
Taylor Parkes |
WSC 250 Dec 07 |
Steve Butler Finding his level |
John Morgan |
WSC 208 Jun 04 |
Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two |
Steve Ragg |
WSC 194 Apr 03 |








Subscribe to this comment's feed