THE ARCHIVE
Football myths
Replica kits are a rip-off | Replica kits are a rip-off |
|
Whoops! How did this one end up here? It’s clearly not a myth at all. The fans are being fleeced – even those most equine of horse’s mouths, Messrs Shepherd and Hall, admitted as much. Questions have been asked in parliament, for goodness’ sake, and usually nothing short of a tragedy will make politicians side with football fans. It’s a simple truth: supporters are being asked to fork out between 40 and 50 quid for something that costs about a fiver to produce. It’s the kind of thing that gives rip-offs a bad name. Or is it? Consider. In these post-modern, brand-driven times, the market-place no longer offers us mere products. Every purchase is now a lifestyle choice – we’re buying into an image, an ethos. What we’re getting when we take that bit of highly coloured synthetic tat (let’s be honest, the product itself is rubbish) off the peg and over to the till is not just a shirt, it’s a whole package. Let’s start by comparing and contrasting with fashion items in general. What does what you wear say about you? If you’re a conscientious wearer of designer gear, the labels you display, rather than improving your street cred, more often than not mark you down as a pretentious prat. You might get called a lot of things in a football shirt, but pretentious is not one of them (I’m assuming here you haven’t adopted an affected passion for some Albanian second division outfit). A football shirt marks you down as a member of the lumpen proletariat and, therefore, OK. Lastly, take a look at where most of the profits from replica sales are going – to your club. If some fans go to the extent of acquiring affinity Visa cards so that those poor mites at Chelsea, Celtic or wherever might profit from their plastic-waving profligacy, then who can complain about the wad from football kits going to those same worthy causes? Anyway, as we all know, rich clubs win things, so the more you line the pockets of your team the more it will win, so who’s the loser there? From WSC 169 March 2001. What was happening this month Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| «Previous | | | Next» |
|---|
Today's most read WSC articles
Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development |
Mike Woitalla |
WSC 145 Mar 99 |
Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two |
Steve Ragg |
WSC 194 Apr 03 |
Major success? MLS's first season |
Mike Woitalla |
WSC 118 Dec 96 |
The domination game Praising Chelsea |
WSC |
WSC 217 Mar 05 |
Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money? |
Jonathan Barnes |
WSC 221 Jul 05 |
Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown |
Darron Kirkby |
WSC 223 Sep 05 |
Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland |
Dianne Millen |
WSC 206 Apr 04 |
No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography |
Taylor Parkes |
WSC 250 Dec 07 |
States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup |
Ethan Zindler |
WSC 151 Sep 99 |
|
|
|








Subscribe to this comment's feed