WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow THE ARCHIVE arrow Clubs arrow Drastic op
Drastic op

Hull City are likely to be saved from extinction... again. But this is an all to common experience for the club, writes Craig Ellyard

There is little doubt that by the time you read this article Hull City will, once again, have been saved. A “my­s­­t­ery consortium” have asked the club’s creditors to accept 30p in the pound on their out­­­­­standing liabilities. If, as expected, agreement is reached, the consortium, hav­ing already lodged a ­substantial bond, will take over the running of the club. So, all’s well that ends well?

Not quite. With the likelihood that the football club and ground will be sold to different parties the potential for further problems is huge. Once again, Hull City could be at the mercy of a landlord who sees Boothferry Park as a building site rather than a sports arena.

The proposed council-funded super stad­ium (see WSC 165) has now become essential to the club’s future. But with a single brick yet to be laid, the Tigers could be forced to groundshare in the interim with their rugby club neighbours. It’s a prospect which fills most Hull City supporters with dread and similar proposals have been bitterly opposed in the past. But with the club lurching from crisis to crisis the new owners may have no alternative.

Once again, the problems of the past are coming back to haunt the club. The financial troubles at Hull can be likened to a long run­ning West End farce; the actors come and go, but the same ludicrous plot remains. Hull’s much touted potential has long been a mag­net for businessmen with their eyes on the main chance but who develop collective am­nesia when it comes to paying the debts.

Unsurprisingly, winding-up orders have been common, and the club was again haul­ed up before a judge in February. With City floundering under a welter of unpaid bills and deploying a squad of players they did not have the means to pay, the court appointed administrators to sell the club. When they hastily hung out the “open to all offers” signs the response was immediate.

Although interested parties were given only two weeks to put together a bid, there was no shortage of takers. Among the usual speculators and “Monopoly millionaires” the most exciting initiative was that of the fans group the Tigers Co-operative.

With such a limited time frame the Co-op, set up to “buy an effective stake in the club”, could not realistically expect to complete a buy-out, but they have achieved far more than was thought possible. Utilising huge publicity and encouraged by the success of a similar co-operative at Lincoln, the Hull group has established a sound financial base. Over 1,500 supporters have bought a shareholding with the capital raised, increasing the Co-op’s influence by the pound. Courted as potential part­ners by a number of consortia involved in the bidding for the club, including the new own­ers, the fans organisation has emerged as a serious player in Hull City’s future.

The players, too, were doing their bit. Unpaid since the turn of the year, the team somehow developed a steely determination which resulted in the club’s best run of wins in 15 years. Brian Little scooping the Manager of the Month prize was just reward for his and the team’s efforts. As the players performed heroics on the pitch, the co-operative was rattling collecting tins on the terraces. Over the course of two weeks the fans chipped in over £12,000 to pay the squad’s wages as a genuine “we’re all in this together” bond developed between players and supporters.

With new owners all but in place and the tantalising prospect of reaching the play-offs looking increasingly realistic, the Tigers Co-operative is redoubling its efforts to ensure a stable future for the club. As chair Rachel Mathieson explains: “We want to expand and raise our profile as much as possible and work with the new owners of the club if that is appropriate. The ultimate aim of the co-op remains to acquire an effective stake in Hull City. In an ideal world that would be a majority shareholding, but a first step could be a seat on the board and building up an effective relationship from within.”

It’s a bold and, given Hull’s financial his­tory, possibly foolhardy move, but the Lincoln experience shows the ideal of com­munity foot­ball clubs administered by supporters can be achieved. Why not in Hull?

From WSC 170 April 2001. What was happening this month

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong

On the subject...

Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 145 Mar 99

Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two   

Steve Ragg   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Major success? MLS's first season   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 118 Dec 96

The domination game Praising Chelsea   

WSC   

WSC 217 Mar 05

Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money?   

Jonathan Barnes   

WSC 221 Jul 05

Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown   

Darron Kirkby   

WSC 223 Sep 05

Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland   

Dianne Millen   

WSC 206 Apr 04

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup   

Ethan Zindler   

WSC 151 Sep 99

WSC digital edition & apps