THE ARCHIVE
Clubs
Trade restrictions | Trade restrictions |
|
With the media gleefully fanning the flames of boardroom discontent (described as a “civil war” in the Daily Telegraph), the last thing Arsenal need is a protracted conflict with sections of their own support. Yet with the announcement that the club has applied to trademark the word “Gooner”, a damaging legal struggle could ensue. The battle over the club’s financial direction could rumble on for a long time – Arsène Wenger and chairman Peter Hill-Wood’s desire for self-sufficiency within five years is in marked contrast to the David Dein-chaired Red and White Holdings’ urge for a rapid injection of cash. The war against global capitalism in N5, however, was lost long ago. Arsenal’s plan to register a word that was coined by supporters over 30 years ago is further evidence of the club’s frequent heavy-handedness when it comes to exploiting their commercial potential. In 2002, after “consultation with numerous fans’ groups” (the identity of which remains a mystery), the club crest was rebranded and the motto Victoria Concordia Crescit (Victory Comes Through Harmony) disappeared altogether. Later that year, the European Court of Justice ruled that street trader Matthew Reed could no longer sell goods using the club’s name, shield and cannon emblem outside Highbury. Reed, who had been trading by the ground for 31 years, argued that the logo was a “badge of allegiance”. The High Court upheld Reed’s argument, but the European Court overturned the decision, ruling that Arsenal must be allowed to protect their trademark. The court said there was “risk of confusion in the minds of supporters as to the origins of the products”, and lawyers argued the club had exclusive rights to the names “Arsenal” and “Arsenal Gunners” as well as the team’s shield and cannon designs. In the current case, the club’s argument appears misguided at best. Kevin Whitcher, editor of fanzine The Gooner, says: “The club has never previously used the word... its origins are indisputably separate from such terms as ‘Arsenal’ or ‘Gunners’.” John Simmons, co-author of The Story of the Arsenal Brand, has warned that the club are in danger of taking the McDonald’s approach, registering so many brands that court cases against fans will inevitably occur. From WSC 248 October 2007
On the subject...
Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| «Previous | | | Next» |
|---|
Today's most read WSC articles
The first time Going to a live match |
Josh Widdicombe |
WSC 270 Aug 09 |
Paul Brooker The new Giggs |
Adam Powley |
WSC 182 Apr 02 |
Another fine mess England try to find a new coach |
WSC |
WSC 232 Jun 06 |
Pools unto themselves History of the Pools Panel |
Al Needham |
WSC 193 Mar 03 |
Leyton Orient's North Terrace A tribute |
Tom Davies |
WSC 194 Apr 03 |
|
|
|
|
Keith O'Neill World is his lobster |
Dave Hannigan |
WSC 207 May 04 |
Exit clause England's World Cup 2006 |
WSC |
WSC 234 Aug 06 |
No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography |
Taylor Parkes |
WSC 250 Dec 07 |
Death of a salesman Les Sealey tribute |
John Earls |
WSC 176 Oct 01 |








Subscribe to this comment's feed