WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

HOME arrow THE ARCHIVE arrow Clubs arrow A home on the grange
A home on the grange

After over 120 years East Stirlingshire FC could be no more if a proposed move goes through. Ken Gall reflects on a club with a rich history and their fight to survive

Even the kindest of souls would have to ack­nowledge that East Stirlingshire FC have not been one of the major players in Scottish foot­ball history. Winners of precisely no major honours and with a grand total of no cup final appearances, even their apparently geo­graph­ically specific name tends to leave fans scratching their heads as to the club’s location (“near Falkirk” is the best most can come up with).

But all those who confuse East Stirling with East Fife (or Stirling Albion) would do well to take heed of the name in the coming months, because, if chairman Alan Mackin has his way, it will disappear entirely after more than 120 years. And while this may not prompt the nat­ional press to clear their pages for a “Save Shire” campaign, it could mark another big step in the battle between Scottish foot­ball’s romantic tendency and the harsh idealists.

The component parts of the story seem familiar. Having acquired a majority shareholding in the club, Mackin and his fellow dir­ectors now propose to sell Shire’s Firs Park home (located, fortuitously, in prime central belt development land) and move the club a few miles to the new town of Grangemouth, where (again fortuitously) an athletics stad­ium is deemed to be suitable for redevelopment. The club would adopt the name of its new home town, and all traces of East Stirlingshire FC would cease to exist by 2003.

On the face of it, it is hard to argue with Mackin’s assertion that Shire’s attempts to compete with the more popular Falkirk FC are “a waste of time”. Crowds (a loose description) rarely number above 400, and the average weekly wage for Shire’s first-teamers is £35. “A move to Grangemouth would let us tap into a town that doesn’t have a senior club,” Mackin points out, arguing it would allow opportunities for greater community development.

Clearly, Mackin’s template is Livingston FC. Eight years ago, businessman Bill Hunter gained control of Meadowbank Thistle, whose aim of becoming Edin­burgh’s third club had proved even more futile than Shire’s attempts to rival Falkirk. Despite the vehement opposition of a couple of hun­dred Thistle die­hards, the move to the Lothian new town proceeded.

This year, if their form holds, Livingston will qualify for the UEFA Cup, a frankly phen­omenal achievement that would seem to vin­dicate Hunter’s decision to move the club. So what is there to stop Mackin and his proposed Grangemouth FC from doing the same thing?

The difference may lie in the attitude of the clubs’ respective boards. Soon after their move, Livingston were taken over by an ex­tremely amibitious group, including former Celtic director Dominic Keane, who invested heavily in players and infrastrucuture. Mack­in and his associates have already announced that part of the money from the sale of Firs Park will be spent on upgrading Grangemouth stad­ium. The remainder – potentially a six-figure sum – will be paid out as dividends to the shareholders, that is, themselves.

Indeed, with admirable frankness, Mackin has stated that the shareholders – apparently including members of his own family – do not want that money to be reinvested because “we realise that football clubs lose money as a business”. Let us be clear – there is nothing il­legal in any of this. In fact, a strong case can be made that Mackin’s idea is the only chance for a near-moribund club to make any kind of progress. And there has been little sign of any mass local protest from the few individuals who could call themselves fans of East Stirling.

The only dissenters would appear to be those romantics who want all football clubs to survive in perpetuity, regardless of their cir­cumstances, and who see men such as Mackin as callous and hard-hearted capitalists, ready to wipe away history in the search for a dollar. The problem is that too few of these are local people, most of whom will barely linger over reports of the possible demise of their home­town club, preferring instead to turn to the latest Old Firm inanities.

Whether this is a bad thing depends, of course, on one’s point of view. But either way, it seems unlikely Shire will be the last small Scottish club to be faced with the dilemma.

From WSC 181 March 2002. What was happening this month

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong

On the subject...

Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Secret agents Agency shareholders   

Extract   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Empty arms The shadow of the Millennium Stadium    

Andrew Turton    

WSC 146 Apr 99

Lothar Matthäus Great player, terrible manager   

Paul Joyce   

WSC 248 Oct 07

Celebrity columns Crass offerings   

Ian Plenderleith   

WSC 161 Jul 00

Northern Ireland 3 Belgium 0 The David Stewart mystery   

Davy Millar   

WSC 141 Nov 98

Jay Bothroyd Not a fan favourite    

Neville Hadsley   

WSC 199 Sep 03

Steve Marlet Fulham's overpriced French import   

James Eastham   

WSC 270 Aug 09

Tokyo pose 1981 World Club Cup   

Cris Freddi   

WSC 176 Oct 01

Unique selling point Hooliganism back in the news   

WSC   

WSC 272 Oct 09

USA Mexico comes to Los Angeles   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 213 Nov 04