WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow THE ARCHIVE arrow Race arrow Happy anniversary?
Happy anniversary?

As the anti-racism organisation celebrates its tenth birthday, Tom Davies spoke to Kick It Out co-ordinator Piara Powar about progress made and the battle still ahead

With the well established Kick It Out campaign now ten seasons old, it’s easy to forget just how mar­­ginal an issue anti-racism in football once was. In the 1980s it took the brave efforts of supporters them­selves, often at the places with the worst reputations such as Leeds and Chelsea, to drag the issue to public prominence. And it’s tempting, now, to congratulate ourselves on just how far we’ve come.

“As a nation we have become more aware,” says Kick It Out’s national co-ordinator, Piara Powar. “The situation is very different to ten years ago, but we still hear of incidents of racial abuse and even monkey chanting.” The shift of emphasis by racist groups towards asylum and immigration also poses chal­lenges. Powar warns: “The presence of the BNP in towns such as Oldham and Burnley in­evitably has a direct spillover into football stadia, so while you may not have the far right leafleting grounds as much as they once did, they do see foot­ball fans as a captive audience.”

For all the progress, crowds remain overwhelmingly white. Fewer than one per cent of Premiership season-ticket holders are black or Asian. Ethnic minority attendance at Nationwide League grounds is generally even lower. Yet grounds often sit in poor, multiracial areas. But the people who stand to benefit most from the decline of explicit ra­cism often find them­selves priced out of attending.

Powar agrees that high prices are a hindrance, but argues that some of the changes that have taken place in the past decade have been beneficial: “There are more women at games now, grounds are safer places to be. But the cost of that has been prices keeping local people away. There’s a commercial argument to be made that if the clubs engaged more with people from ethnic communities they could potentially spend as much at the club as everyone else. But I do think that clubs need to think about offering reduced prices.”

Cost, clearly, isn’t everything though. The club with comfortably the most multiracial following in Eng­land is, after all, Arsenal. Powar feels that Arsenal benefit from a fluid local population, which contains the white working and middle classes living among a large and varied ethnic community. But other clubs are in similar surroundings. Why have they not been as suc­cessful? “The clubs have got to have a serious com­mitment. They have to engage with schools in the right way. The standardised coaching schemes they run, for example, are often far too expensive. They’ve got to engage in the right way and for the right reasons.”

Having a cosmopolitan trophy-winning side also helps, as does the presence of star players with whom to identify. “At Arsenal there was the Ian Wright factor,” says Powar. “He was one of the most widely admired black players in the 1990s, and that’s been continued with Thierry Henry.”

Smaller clubs, on the other hand, cannot sell themselves on stars and play­­ing honours and must rely on his­tory. “Racism, or fear of racism, might not be as much of a factor as it used to,” says Powar, “and lower down people might be able to afford to go, but there might be other things. It might be about a cultural space – they feel the club is not for them. Immigrants arrive in an area and cannot cite the same historical fervour about a club that other fans can.”

Exclusion doesn’t just happen in the stands, of course, and Kick It Out is lobbying strongly around racism at grass-roots level as well as at the higher eche­lons of the game, where management, coaching and administration are overwhelmingly a white preserve. The organisation also intends to step up its campaigning around England games, though the national side’s black support has increased. “The Japan World Cup was notable for a new attitude of ‘white shirt, no shame’, whereas before a lot of black and minority fans generally were backing off and automatically supporting Brazil, or perhaps France. This has been a very distinct change,” says Powar.

But while it would be daft to pretend we’re dealing with the same problems as in 1986 or even 1994, we must be aware that complacency is not an option.

From WSC 205 March 2004. What was happening this month

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong

On the subject...

Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 145 Mar 99

Major success? MLS's first season   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 118 Dec 96

The domination game Praising Chelsea   

WSC   

WSC 217 Mar 05

Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two   

Steve Ragg   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland   

Dianne Millen   

WSC 206 Apr 04

States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup   

Ethan Zindler   

WSC 151 Sep 99

Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown   

Darron Kirkby   

WSC 223 Sep 05

Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money?   

Jonathan Barnes   

WSC 221 Jul 05

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

Unreasonable force Heavy policing in Portugal   

Adam Brown   

WSC 123 May 97