WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow December 2008 arrow Defending Sol Campbell
Defending Sol Campbell

ImageThursday 11 December ~

Yesterday police released pictures of Spurs fans they want to trace in relation to the recent abuse of Sol Campell. We look back to WSC 175 (September 2001) when Paul Kelso examined Campbell's defection to Arsenal

Sol Campbell’s departure from Tottenham is going to hurt. It hurt when the move was ann­ounced, it hurt when pictures of him in an Arsenal shirt appeared in the Mirror (at the behest of its Arsenal-supporting editor Piers Morgan) and it will hurt a lot more every time he raises his right arm for offside at High­bury.

For Tottenham fans it was a desperate end to an ugly public auction conducted between Sol, his agent Sky Andrew and half the clubs in western Europe. But there are two things it was not. First, it was not a suprise – only one club could satisfy Campbell’s key criteria (cash aside) of staying in London and of playing Champions League football. And second, it wasn’t Campbell’s fault. The blame for the departure of the finest player to be groomed at White Hart Lane since Glenn Hoddle lies squarely with the managers and directors res­ponsible for running down one of Europe’s great clubs over the past decade.

That is why I will not be calling Campbell Judas. Routinely during the summer’s long­est-running transfer saga, as the size of Camp­bell’s alleged demands grew to unsustainable levels – £130,000 a week was reportedly the breaking point – it was said that no player was bigger than the club. In fact, precisely the op­posite is true. Tot­tenham couldn’t keep Sol Campbell be­cause his ambition, his ability and his value in the market far outstripped that of the club that nurtured him from the play­ground to the Premiership.

Spurs’ progress over the last de­cade should have mirrored that of Campbell. Instead the club’s progress has more in common with the fading career of John Scales, Campbell’s occ­asional part­ner at centre-half. The men to blame are Alan Sugar and the succession of second-rate staff he hired that allowed the club to fall from the Big Five to the Dodgy Dozen clubs that swim in mid-table;  too good to go down, but no chance in the league.

Campbell’s debut came in 1993, a year after the Sky television deal that accompanied the creation of the Premiership, in a Spurs side featuring Jürgen Klinsmann, Teddy Sheringham and Nick Barmby. It was a turning point for the game and should have been for the club. Nobody knew better than the chairman the reality of the new world. Sugar, after all, had nipped out of the negotiating room to let Sky’s Sam Chisholm know that more cash was needed to beat off ITV’s bid.

Yet instead of investing the windfall in quality, and continuing to spend as Manchester United and Arsenal did, the chairman em­barked on an economy drive that apparently had more to do with his ego than the club’s wellbeing. Sugar was always determined to prove to football he could do it his way, and was unable or unwilling to hear the laughter from boardrooms that were happy to invest in Carlos Kickaballs, as long as they could win them trophies. The result, as Campbell made his England debut in 1996, was a club settling for frugality and a defensive approach pre­cisely at the mo­ment Manchester United’s lavish spending and breathtaking pass-and-move was beginning to dominate.

Come Campbell’s finest hour, the 0-0 draw with Italy in Rome in 1997 that secured Eng­land’s qualification for the World Cup, Spurs were flirting with relegation under the guid­ance of a Swiss no-hoper Christian Gross, hired on the say-so of Ottmar Hitzfeld, who didn’t fancy the job. Arsenal had just acquired the clearly brilliant Arsène Wenger. Sugar’s for­eigner, like almost everything else he did for the club, was second rate by comparison.

Campbell waited for the club’s ambition to match his own; instead Sugar brought in George Graham, who, despite his reputation, couldn’t even build a solid back four around the best centre-half in the country. Now all three have gone. Hoddle’s second coming was too late; in his mind Campbell has al­ready given the club two years more than he had to.

He is not the first to have jumped ship for the sake of silverware. This year we will wel­come back Teddy Sher­ingham, another who felt he had little choice but to move to ful­fil himself. He will be for­given by the ever-fickle faithful within the first 90 minutes of the season. Here’s hoping the new board is not allowed to forget why he, and now Sol, felt they had to leave in the first place.

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong
Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 145 Mar 99

Major success? MLS's first season   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 118 Dec 96

The domination game Praising Chelsea   

WSC   

WSC 217 Mar 05

Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two   

Steve Ragg   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland   

Dianne Millen   

WSC 206 Apr 04

States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup   

Ethan Zindler   

WSC 151 Sep 99

Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown   

Darron Kirkby   

WSC 223 Sep 05

Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money?   

Jonathan Barnes   

WSC 221 Jul 05

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

Unreasonable force Heavy policing in Portugal   

Adam Brown   

WSC 123 May 97