THE ARCHIVE
Non-League
Pyramid schemes | Pyramid schemes |
|
T he glum knot of red-and-black-clad fans huddled in the main stand intrigued spectators at the Isthmian League play-off game between Bedford and St Albans. Could they be rossoneri supporters nostalgic for the atmosphere of the San Siro while visiting relatives in the south midlands? In fact the gloomy little group were from Lewes, in Bedford to watch their own team take on the hometown Eagles. Unfortunately the players were back at Lewes’s ground beating Kingstonian. Until late the previous day Isthmian League officials insisted the Rooks would indeed be playing Bedford, contrary to all other indicators. It took a Football Association announcement to override their stubbornness and correct the error. To date there’s been no word of any apology from league officials. So it’s with a sense of relief, as well as triumph, that Lewes take their place among the 44 clubs making up the new northern and southern divisions beneath the Conference. The Conference are nothing if not efficient and it’s hard to imagine them committing a blunder of Isthmian-like proportions. In this respect, at least, membership of the new league can only represent an improvement but what will it mean otherwise? The two, as yet unnamed, new divisions make up step two of the FA’s restructured pyramid, with step one the unaltered Conference. Step three features the reshuffled carcasses of the Northern Premier, Southern and Isthmian leagues; four regional divisions of the same leagues make up step four. Step five consists of 15 county leagues, with lower steps represented by their subdivisions. In the face of the changes, for now fans’ spirits are moderately high, with most looking forward to new rivalries and different burgers. The bubble of enthusiasm among supporters of the new Conference teams is especially noticeable. They see membership as a rise in status and expect entertaining football and increased attendances as a result. In reality, however, most are in precisely the position they were this past season – one notch below the Conference proper – and it’s hard to see where any sustainable increase in support will come from. Supporters of step-three clubs are less happy: they expect loss of talent to clubs above them followed by declining gates. It’s at this level where the failure to address one of restructuring’s principal tasks is most evident. With the exception of the Isthmian League, now essentially a London and south Essex rump, travelling distances are still considerable. The Southern League reaches from Kings Lynn to Tiverton and the Northern Premier from Workington to Lincoln. Visiting support for most midweek games was rare last season. Now, given the distances and costs involved, it may be hard for players to show up, too. From WSC 209 July 2004. What was happening this month On the subject...
Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| «Previous | | | Next» |
|---|
Today's most read WSC articles
Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development |
Mike Woitalla |
WSC 145 Mar 99 |
Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two |
Steve Ragg |
WSC 194 Apr 03 |
Major success? MLS's first season |
Mike Woitalla |
WSC 118 Dec 96 |
The domination game Praising Chelsea |
WSC |
WSC 217 Mar 05 |
Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money? |
Jonathan Barnes |
WSC 221 Jul 05 |
Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown |
Darron Kirkby |
WSC 223 Sep 05 |
States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup |
Ethan Zindler |
WSC 151 Sep 99 |
Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland |
Dianne Millen |
WSC 206 Apr 04 |
Kenny Achampong Tricky midfielder who disappeared |
Tom Davies |
WSC 179 Jan 02 |
No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography |
Taylor Parkes |
WSC 250 Dec 07 |








Subscribe to this comment's feed