THE ARCHIVE
Editorials
Earning your keep | Earning your keep |
|
If Rio Ferdinand succeeds in getting his Manchester United salary increased to £120,000 a week, he will receive in a month what someone on the average wage would take 19 years to earn. In recent newspaper reports on his contract negotiations, Rio was depicted wearing a Che Guevara baseball cap, so he may have plans to redistribute his bloated income in a manner befitting someone who identifies with a Marxist revolutionary. But it is none the less fair to assume that he will receive advice to the contrary and that his wages will continue to be spent on fast cars, holidays in exclusive resorts and helping Jody Morris to release fire extinguishers in hotel corridors. To Rio’s agent, his increased salary, double that of his next-best-paid team-mate Roy Keane, will be simply what he is worth as “the best central defender in the world”. Allowing for hyperbole, that makes a sort of sense: a club’s most important player would expect his wages to reflect his value to the team and, of course, labour markets are not fair – otherwise football clubs would have no justification for paying players 1,000 times the amount received by those who do more socially valuable jobs. But this summer’s transfer merry-go-round has been a more depressing spectacle than ever before, both for demonstrating footballers’ inflated sense of their own worth and the way in which money has come to dominate their career decisions. Nowadays it is common to hear pundits such as Alan Hansen suggesting that “at the end of your career you want to look back at what you won, not study your bank balance”. This piece of wisdom has been repeated so often over the past decade that it has come to be accepted as an ancient and immutable truth. Steven Gerrard says it, Craig Bellamy says it, no doubt Frank Arnesen is muttering it to himself even as you read this – it’s medals that count. But is it? Tom Finney, Stanley Matthews and Wilf Mannion could muster just a single FA Cup winner’s gong between them. Is anyone seriously suggesting that history will regard the trio as lesser players than, say, Nigel Winterburn? From WSC 222 August 2005. What was happening this month On the subject...
Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| «Previous | | | Next» |
|---|
Today's most read WSC articles
The domination game Praising Chelsea |
WSC |
WSC 217 Mar 05 |
Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown |
Darron Kirkby |
WSC 223 Sep 05 |
Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development |
Mike Woitalla |
WSC 145 Mar 99 |
Major success? MLS's first season |
Mike Woitalla |
WSC 118 Dec 96 |
Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two |
Steve Ragg |
WSC 194 Apr 03 |
States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup |
Ethan Zindler |
WSC 151 Sep 99 |
Plymouth Argyle Underachievement, kits and rivals |
Rob Synnott |
WSC 183 May 02 |
Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money? |
Jonathan Barnes |
WSC 221 Jul 05 |
Unreasonable force Heavy policing in Portugal |
Adam Brown |
WSC 123 May 97 |
No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography |
Taylor Parkes |
WSC 250 Dec 07 |








Subscribe to this comment's feed