WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

HOME arrow WSC DAILY arrow November 2008 arrow A new south London pad?
A new south London pad?

ImageSunday 9 November ~

When Chelsea were formed in 1905 they wanted to call themselves London FC. This was blocked by the FA who seeking to develop professional football in various districts of the capital and wanted clubs to take names based on their localities – although a little later, Arsenal were not required to add Highbury to their name after they moved from Woolwich. Today, Chelsea have denied reports in several papers that they are considering a reverse relocation to Arsenal's, to Battersea, on the south side of the river a few miles from their current home.

Architects HOK claim to have had a meeting with Chelsea officials at which they presented plans for ground with a capacity of 65-75,000. A club official was scornful: "We are approached on a regular basis by developers and others with a commercial interest in driving up the price of property." But there is little doubt that the club could make a huge sum of money from selling the land in and around Stamford Bridge which would more than match the cost of constructing a new ground elsewhere. And it is known that they have commissioned studies into ways of expanding the capacity of Stamford Bridge which is hemmed in by the adjacent shopping district.  

Although they have been playing at their ground for over 100 years, Chelsea are less rooted in their local community than any of the major London clubs, with a fanbase spread across the city and the surrounding region. So on the face of it, a move to the south side of the river wouldn't inconvenience most of their fans, but it remains to be seen whether they would have need of a significantly larger stadium. Chelsea were the best supported club in the Football League for much of the 1920s but that was partly a consequence of Stamford Bridge's size relative the other First Division grounds in London. In modern times Chelsea's hardcore support has been roughly on a par with West Ham’s and significantly behind that of Arsenal and Spurs. This has begun to change during the Abramovich era but many new Chelsea fans are consummate consumers of Premier League brand, as satellite viewers both in the UK and, increasingly, overseas rather than matchday attendees.

While Spurs say they have over 20,000 people on a waiting list for season tickets at White Hart Lane, which holds less than 40,000, Stamford Bridge is regularly below capacity for League and European games. And if spectators aren't turning up now, with the team on top of the League and playing their most expansive football since the Abramovich takeover, when will they ever come? Indeed it has been suggested that Premier League gates have now peaked, with the recession having a significant impact. In which case they might not need to be in a hurry to expand Stamford Bridge let alone relocate to stage their 4-0 home strolls in front of a half-empty Abramovich Dome, riverside views notwithstanding.

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong

On the subject...

Comments (2)
Comment by Insert witty username 10-11-2008 09:30    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

By no means am I an expert on all things Chelsea, but I would imagine their 'lack of local support' is due to the gentrification of Chelsea. In any case, I'm sure there are far more Chelsea fans in Battersea than there are in Chelsea.

Comment by Pedro 10-11-2008 21:23    [Offensive? Unsuitable?
Report this comment
]

Actually, Chelsea sell out for every league game...Chelsea fill their ground around 97% as average over the season, significantly more than Liverpool for example, the only reason it is not 100% is the number of empty seats for segregation purposes, more so on champions league nights when the first 4 rows are kept empty.

Chelsea won't be moving until all possibilities of expanding the bridge are exhausted... see the official site.

Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two   

Steve Ragg   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 145 Mar 99

Major success? MLS's first season   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 118 Dec 96

The domination game Praising Chelsea   

WSC   

WSC 217 Mar 05

States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup   

Ethan Zindler   

WSC 151 Sep 99

Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland   

Dianne Millen   

WSC 206 Apr 04

Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown   

Darron Kirkby   

WSC 223 Sep 05

Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money?   

Jonathan Barnes   

WSC 221 Jul 05

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

Unreasonable force Heavy policing in Portugal   

Adam Brown   

WSC 123 May 97