WSC Logo



SEARCH  

Advanced search

dig
ROB

Weekly Howl

A mixture of comment, fact and captivating trivia via email

Sign up

Follow WSC

 twitter

NEWSFEEDS

sstore

 

Money go round

Steve Menary reports on the increasing shortage of City investors in football's surviving plcs

Sheffield United’s board must be pretty sure of promotion to the Premiership having turned to the Stock Exchange to raise £10.7 million early last month. A large slice of the cash is earmarked for players’ wages, but the club will plough £2.7m into a redevelopment of the corner stand at Bramall Lane due for completion in May and £1m towards buying a £4m health club in Staines. Chief executive officer Jason Rockett said: “We’re trying to create a new model for a club and produce off-field revenue with the club at the centre. It’s got to be a more sustainable business.”

The Blades already own the Impact Gym in Sheffield and are considering building a hotel and casino, which would probably be viewed as better investments by interested investors than players’ wages – certainly if Watford overhaul the Blades for the second guaranteed promotion spot. This would appear to be quite a big gamble for any City institutions interested in investing, but not much of the £10.7m that will be raised in return for new shares is likely to come from the Square Mile.

Scarborough Property, a company controlled by Blades chairman Kevin McCabe, is putting up £8.4m in return for more shares, with the club hoping that City punters will make up the difference. As McCabe already controls 46.8 per cent of Sheffield United plc and could own up to 62 per cent after the fundraising, under City rules he should have to buy the remaining shares he does not own. Instead, he is being allowed to bypass this rule by the Takeover Panel, with the deal expected to be waved through by the plc on March 3.

The Takeover Panel is making this exception because institutions don’t want to invest in football clubs any more – certainly not into a club intending to plough such a huge chunk of the funds being raised into players’ pockets.

Professor Christine Oughton at Birkbeck College’s football governance research centre says: “Clubs expected a big rise in revenue from TV, but investors didn’t realise the clubs are under pressure to spend it all. Football’s prune-juice economics meant it all went straight out again on players’ wages.” How many fund managers will want to add to McCabe’s largesse?

Since Manchester United floated in 1991, there have been 27 English and Scottish clubs listed on the Stock Exchange, along with Swansea from Wales. After an initial boom, disastrous financial performances at clubs falling out of the Premiership, such as Leeds, Leicester and Nottingham Forest, sent share prices into freefall and clubs started to quit the stock market. QPR delisted in 2001 and a wave of clubs followed: Aberdeen and Bolton Wanderers in 2003 and Sunderland in 2004, Celtic last December and West Bromwich Albion and Hearts in January.

When Manchester United succumbed to the Glazers, the only blue-chip football club were gone. Unlike most plc clubs, United were profitable and provided dividends for shareholders. Football funds such as Singer & Friedlander’s scheme, which boasted Alan Hansen, have produced woeful returns.

For the dozen clubs left languishing on the stock market, the problem is how to get off it. Birmingham City were looking to escape five years ago, while only Roman Abramovich’s deep pockets could afford to buy debt-laden Chelsea. Like the Blades, Chelsea had downgraded from the main Stock Exchange to the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) as this junior market has fewer regulations and staying quoted is cheaper.

Arsenal, Manchester City and Rangers are quoted on Ofex, an even more loosely regulated market known as the third division of the Stock Exchange. Looser regulation allows big investors such as Rangers’ David Murray to hold a controlling interest in the club without being forced to buy the rest of the shares. On the main London Stock Exchange, any shareholder – such as the Glazers – must offer to buy all the shares once they acquire a 30 per cent stake, or seek a waiver as McCabe did.

For fans, the shares are about more than a return, but investors who swooped for a quick profit and face a big loss on their investment have scored a sorry own goal and will find little sympathy among supporters.

From WSC 230 April 2006. What was happening this month

Share this article:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Mister.Wong
Comments (0)
Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Today's most read WSC articles

Major success? MLS's first season   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 118 Dec 96

The domination game Praising Chelsea   

WSC   

WSC 217 Mar 05

Oldham Athletic Dowie, Wembley, Division Two   

Steve Ragg   

WSC 194 Apr 03

Teenage anguish - USA MLS youth development   

Mike Woitalla   

WSC 145 Mar 99

Firm Favourites: Old Firm Sectarianism in Scotland   

Dianne Millen   

WSC 206 Apr 04

Unpopularity contest West Ham and Terence Brown   

Darron Kirkby   

WSC 223 Sep 05

Amir Karic and Ulrich Le Pen Not worth the money?   

Jonathan Barnes   

WSC 221 Jul 05

States of happiness 1999 women's World Cup   

Ethan Zindler   

WSC 151 Sep 99

No love, no joy Tim Lovejoy’s rubbish autobiography   

Taylor Parkes   

WSC 250 Dec 07

Unreasonable force Heavy policing in Portugal   

Adam Brown   

WSC 123 May 97