Comments for Tangled Webb at http://www.wsc.co.uk , comment 0 to 5 out of 5 comments http://www.wsc.co.uk Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:28:47 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/903/38/#pc_68 Surely the complexities of the seeding system means that England could not just be assumed to take Croatia or Russia's place? Who knows what pot they would have been in? I don't think it's like the FA Cup, where I could legitimately speculate that Ipswich were just a semi-final win against West Brom away from Wembley if only they'd seen off Portsmouth, then Plymouth, then Preston, then Manchester United... - coisa alaranjada quente Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:29:30 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/903/38/#pc_67 Clive Thomas' HALF-time whistle. - don kiddick Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:38:55 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/903/38/#pc_66 Of course, if a foreign referee had given that decision against England in similar circumstances, the newspapers' comments would read slightly different. His website would probably get a record number of hits too. - J1s Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:05:25 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/903/38/#pc_65 "... conveniently ignoring the fact that by the end of qualifying it was Russia’s place we were chasing in the tournament, not Croatia’s." And YOU are falling into exactly the same trap. WE weren't chasing Russia - WE were chasing Germany and the Czech Republic. The Scots were chasing France and Italy whilst Northern Ireland were chasing Sweden and Spain ... I expect better from WSC. - Jorge Porbillas Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:40:24 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/903/38/#pc_64 My thoughts on Peter Drury - a man whose gushing paeans of praise for the great and good of football are so oligeanous that they should warrant an investigation by environmental groups - are not many. But what remains suggests a cricket bat aimed at the back of his head solely for the twin pleasures of shutting him up and catharsis release. - ian.64 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:29:27 +0100