Comments for Premier League benefits from a loss of lustre at http://www.wsc.co.uk , comment 0 to 3 out of 3 comments http://www.wsc.co.uk Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:57:13 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/5670/38/#pc_2423 I think the conspicuous lack of transfer activity outside of Eastlands actually favours Chelsea and Arsenal. Chelsea, because they were the best team last time around and very little has changed and Arsenal because as a young team they are constantly improving and evolving and they haven't lost any of their star players for once. Manchester City are trying to introduce too many new players at once to be instantly competitive, Liverpool seem to be in danger of stagnating and Tottenham Hotspur's squad looks a little thin to cope with the added strain which would be placed on it by the Champions League. Meanwhile Manchester United look about as good as they did last time around, which was not quite good enough. It could all change between now and the end of the transfer window but the state of the Premier League at present is very similar to what it was at the end of last season. - James Goyder Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:40:32 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/5670/38/#pc_2416 indeed now that liverpool have beaten macedonias finest, there can be no doubt that the premier league is the worlds greatest - shadsworth cloud Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:29:46 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/5670/38/#pc_2413 "The bombast will be cranked up again for the new season but no one can fail to be aware that it's a sham now. The feted young men being paid up to 20 grand a day are not among the best players in the world." Oh, that new awareness will fade quicker than you think. They'll be 'the best in the world' in next to no time. Again. - ian.64 Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:29:47 +0100