Comments for A new champion but little quality in MLS at http://www.wsc.co.uk , comment 0 to 5 out of 5 comments http://www.wsc.co.uk Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:32:21 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/4116/38/#pc_1189 MLS does have the "supporters shield", which rewards the winner of the league with a fan made trophy and a place in the CONCAChampions. Next year, MLS teams will play each other twice home and away, in a balanced schedule. I don't think playoffs are a bad thing, Mexico's league has grown in popularity since they instituted two short seasons and champions every year. Every team has a realistic shot at winning and it has helped spur a sort of golden age for the league. Hopefully the league keeps improving and someday soon we can watch Championship playoff level teams! - radmonkey Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:26:22 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/4116/38/#pc_1188 I have noticed similar problems in Australia's A-League. We have plenty of goals, incident, controversy, slapstick and competitiveness. However, the evenness which the salary cap engenders also takes a lot of the interest away as games become essentially a roll of the dice. When the top club in the league's longest winning run is around 3 games and every side has lost at least a quarter of their games,there is no real glamour team whose qualities one can appreciate and whose defeats one can truly revel in. Essentially, the salary cap makes the league like a walk in the dutch countryside. The colours may be pretty, but it's all so flat. It will be interesting to see if in slowly adding to the number of out of Cap players each squad can sign, the MLS will gently reach a point where competitiveness and topographic interest are nicely balanced. - Rory Bunk Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:21 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/4116/38/#pc_1187 I like that a bad team one year can be good the next, but it wouldn't be so bad if there were a bit more spread within any given season so that there could be at least two or three attractive teams. I wish they'd make the league competition just a straight table and award the trophy to the winner. They don't play enough games to make travel such a hardship so the conference set-up is unnecessary. If that were the case, the closeness of all the teams in the standings would make for a much more exciting race. The playoffs, which MLS would like to be the showcase of the league, come in mid autumn where the TV sports calendar is chock-a-block with American football and basketball. There's just no hope for MLS to make much in-roads then and, as it is now, the league race is dull because only the really, really crap teams don't make the playoffs and there's no great advantage to finishing first. And yet, the teams all seem to be primarily focused on making the playoffs, at the expense of devaluing the US Cup and all of these other CONCACAF compeitions that get ginned-up every year. Better to just stick with the straight table and have the league end by the end of August. Then spend the autumn and spring focused on various international cup competitions. Perhaps we could get the rest of CONCACAF to go along with that somehow. - Reed of the Valley People Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:25:45 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/4116/38/#pc_1186 This is my first year following the MLS - Toronto FC - and while the football is maybe lower Championship or League one standard, I definately like the parity between teams. LA can go from a bad team one year to winning the next which is a refreshing change from the Premier League. But saying that I don't like seeing the playoffs deciding who is the MLS Champion. Teams play 30 games over a a season only for a knockout competition through a few rounds decide who is the winner? I think the emphesis should be on the league winner and by all means have a knockout competition (even including the lower league) with a grand final in a neutral venue to end the season, much like the English FA Cup. But through 30 games the team with the big trophy should be the league winners. Still, for what is is currently, Sunday nights game was still entertaining and hopefully Toronto - with a sellout 20,000 stadium game in-game out can finally crack the playoffs, or better still, win the league!! - PRB Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:14:59 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/4116/38/#pc_1184 Last summer I happened to be in Utah and went to see Real Salt Lake play out a fairly dull 0-0 draw with San Jose Earthquakes. The guy next to me was a season ticket holder and said he only bought his season ticket because he wanted to see David Beckham when the Galaxy came. He also said that he didn't care who won, just that he saw a few goals and an entertaining game (sadly, neither turned out for him). I thought the overall match experience was great though the talent was pretty lacking. Talking to two fans on the way back into the city on the light rail system was fun. They asked how I thought MLS compared with soccer "where you're from". I diplomatically said that I thought the teams out there would compete with the teams I see live over here, but didn't tell them that I follow a League 2 side. Still, for all MLS's faults, it's no bad thing for a national league to be feasibly won by any team in the league. And as for aiming for the eighth placed cut off point as a sign of success - what's the difference between that and the mid-placed Premier League teams dreaming of making it to fourth? MLS might be crap, but at least it's not predictable. - Jongudmund Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:35:05 +0100