<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Paternal instinct of the football pundit</title>
		<description>Comments for Paternal instinct of the football pundit at http://www.wsc.co.uk , comment 0 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.wsc.co.uk</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:56:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/4076/38/#pc_1172</link>
			<description>Great point there, I would love to see Lineker talking to Martin Samuel and Patrick Barclay after a game. Two people who usual take differing views from each other and have watched a lot of football. However what I get is a barely coherent Merson talking some rubbish, Jamie Redknapp telling me Frank is a nice boy and didn't his dad do well, and Shearer shoehorning himself into a pair of trousers in time to tell me nothing of particular interest. - Lincoln</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:41:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/4076/38/#pc_1171</link>
			<description>The problem with punditry is that they all have connections in the game and are hesitant to criticise anyone and breaking up the nauseating, cosy ex-footballers pally act. Or it could be that ex-footballers by and large have nothing interesting to say.

It would be nice to occasionally see journalists with a keen insight on the game like Tim Vickery, Jonathan Wilson or Sid Lowe have a chance as a pundit but I guess that's too much to hope for.

And on the other end of the scale from bland punditry you have Alan Green... - t.j.vickerman</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:25:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

