Comments for Losing a few games is not a crisis at http://www.wsc.co.uk , comment 0 to 7 out of 7 comments http://www.wsc.co.uk Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:15:58 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/3944/38/#pc_1131 I think you may have misjudged the average Lincoln fan's feeling towards the Codheads but an otherwise great article. Lincoln themselves almost went out of business way back in 2002 and thankfully turned it around and got to the playoffs. Back in those days when we went into admin the authorities were not dead set on crushing teams who find themselves in that position by taking lots of points off. When will Chelsea get their points taken off for gaining an unfair financial advantage? Ah that's different isn't it. Of all the teams who sum up a crisis in the football leagues look at another Lincolnshire side, Boston. 3 relegations in two seasons and only just survived. Gone from being the smallest league football club to one of the biggest in the Unibond. - Lincoln Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:34:42 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/3944/38/#pc_1112 Perspective and balance? On a football website??!! Hang your head in shame, you ... you ... you WEIRDO!!! (You couldn't speak to a few Rangers Trustees on my behalf,Ian, could you?) - Alex Anderson Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:28:02 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/3944/38/#pc_1111 It's a sad state of affairs when clubs in danger of going out of existence don't merit more attention than a "big" club's manager giving a press conference. - Kid A Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:36:10 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/3944/38/#pc_1107 Grand writing, Mr. P. Apparently, the 'crisis' at Liverpool was enough to warrant a 28-page pullout in the Independent this week. Southend's perilous state? One paragraph. But this is football, where the biggest are fawned upon in a way that would call for a phone-book sized edition of Private Eye's Order Of The Brown Nose. It's a bit like reading about the Royal Family on every page of a daily newspaper. It would take a seismic shift in journalistic attitudes to break free of this starry-eyed shite that allows almost continuous, unabated arse-licking from the great and good (and unbearable) of the football hacks, and, currently, one has to withstand the oohing and aahing over Benitez's 'dwindling' squad - yep, sympathy for a squad and manager of a club that's supposedly got an accomplished academy of young players and had spent oceans of cash on their first team in not-too-many years previously. The heart bleeds. But, we're lone voices in this Goliath-loving age. The sycophancy goes on. Permanently. - ian.64 Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:23:21 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/3944/38/#pc_1106 Excellent article and I agree with every word. And that's why WSC is still by far the best read for me. It covers the issues that matter to people who love the game as a whole. It may be my imagination but it seems the mainstream media outlets cannot cover in depth anything not involving Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea or Liverpool. Perhaps not a good idea to send my cheque in the post... - t.j.vickerman Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:04:36 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/3944/38/#pc_1105 Hear hear. Eloquently expressed, Mr P. - The Exploding Vole Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:31:13 +0100 http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/3944/38/#pc_1104 Intense applause for that, Ian. - G.Man wants a hyphen Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:13:14 +0100