HOME
WSC DAILY
WEEKLY HOWL
THE ARCHIVE
BOOK REVIEWS
PEOPLE
MESSAGE BOARD
LINKS
SHOP



Dots

WSC SHOP

Visit our shop
Dots

NEWSFEEDS

Dots
sub_banner

SEARCH WSC  

Advanced search

Inset for WSC
books offers tower
HOME arrow MESSAGE BOARD
Message Board
Welcome, Guest
Re:Football should be 10-a-side. (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Re:Football should be 10-a-side.
#18559
imp
Posts: 387
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The Mighty Imps of Lindum Gender: Male Stay-At-Home Indie-Pop Jaffa cakes, by the packet Purnell's Enyclopedia Of Association Football (72) Best not follow through on last night's ideas NME C-81 cassette Birthdate: 1965-07-20
posted 25-04-2008 20:01

 
But what do most coaches do when their team's reduced to ten men? They take off an attacker. I don't think it would necessarily be any different even if both sides started equal but a man down. Formations would be 4-4-1 or 3-5-1. It's possible that everyone would play the way Man United and Rangers did in Europe this week, when both teams won magnificently by nil goals to nil.

It's not 11-a-side that's made football more negative, it's the absolutely all-important imperative of repeating Champions League qualification to mainatain projected revenue streams, and the overall dominant philosophy that results matter more than style.
Please note, although no boardcode buttons are shown, they are still useable
 
Logged Logged  
 
      Topics Author Date
    thread link
Football should be 10-a-side.
AngleofPostandBar 25-04-2008 16:49
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:Football should be 10-a-side.
imp 25-04-2008 20:01
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop