Wow, that is a doozy, that thread.Just over 2 years and 53 pages and who would've thunk that it would be about Dawkins.
In other news, one of the lads on my course wants to apply to Oxford to study bacterial flagellum in order to counter any ID arguments. Rather comically, he asked me to proof-read his personal statement. My strong yearning for truth forbad me from sabotaging him ("You spell Darwin with two "N"s, mate)
That Snake limerick is excellent and I shall be using it next week.
Having enjoyed the Snake, I thought that, after the Betjemen week, I was actually enjoying some poetry.Yesterday, however, we did "Bavarian Gratians"
Fuck me, that is shit
"Blue, dark, blue, dark
blue, dark, blue, dark,
Classical Greek reference
Blue, dark, blue, dark
blue, dark, blue, dark,
Classical Greek reference"
....repeat ad nauseum
Not even any innuendo in there.
(My critique is going to have to be a bit fleshed out here, I feel)
Apropos of that, of course, the lecturer said "Did anyone else see the sexual imagery in 'The Snake'" to which I remarked that I was the only person on our study group to. The lecturer said "I thought you might, you always do"
Apologies, this assignment is really going to need a lot of redrafting. Where the fuck did I get "Gratians" from? I know less about that than I do gentians
QUOTE: Apologies, this assignment is really going to need a lot of redrafting.
Not my field or anything, but all that repetition that Lawrence sometimes goes in for, in prose as well as poetry, is of course quite deliberate, and it wouldn't do to say it's crap without trying to understand the effect he's after. (A similar point was made, I think, at the Lady Chatterley trial, by one of the defence witnesses.)