HOME
WSC DAILY
WEEKLY HOWL
THE ARCHIVE
BOOK REVIEWS
PEOPLE
MESSAGE BOARD
LINKS
SHOP



Dots

WSC SHOP

Visit our shop
Dots

NEWSFEEDS

Dots
footinet_BANNER

SEARCH WSC  

Advanced search

Inset for WSC
Subs tower
HOME arrow MESSAGE BOARD
Message Board
Welcome, Guest
Re:is there a Zimbabwe cricket thread? (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Re:is there a Zimbabwe cricket thread?
#60345
Mighty Mudhsuden
Posts: 341
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Northampton, Celtic Gender: Male Fig roll Success by Martin Amis Birthdate: 1978-06-30
posted 04-07-2008 11:36

 
If not, this has just come out (courtesy cricinfo):

QUOTE:

Zimbabwe pull out of World Twenty20

Ajay S Shankar in Dubai

July 4, 2008

Zimbabwe have agreed to pull out of next year's Twenty20 World Cup in England, clearing the roadblocks for the competition to be staged there, but will retain their status as Full Member of the ICC and receive funding as usual. They will also receive their full participation fee for the tournament.

"We have decided to pull out in the larger interests of the game," Peter Chingoka, the chairman of Zimbabwe Cricket, told Cricinfo. "We have been informed that the British government may not grant visas to our players, and that situation may prevail during the Twenty20 World Cup. We don't want to be gatecrashers."

"It was a collective decision and I was a part of that decision," Sharad Pawar, the BCCI president, told Cricinfo.

"The full membership of Zimbabwe is currently not in doubt," ICC president David Morgan said. "There was not even a discussion on the issue of Zimbabwe's membership. Everybody stands to benefit from the decision. Zimbabwe will be entitled to participation fees in the tournament like any other member. The ICC could not jeopardise the tournament."

The decision, Chingoka said, pertained only to the tournament in England. "We are now looking forward to more tours and international cricket with our Asian friends, especially India."

The Zimbabwe issue had occupied a large part of the discussions during the ICC executive board meeting, which carried over to an unscheduled third day on Friday after a failure to reach a consensus.

Some countries, led by England and South Africa, had been pushing for Zimbabwe to be stripped of Full Member status but that move had been opposed by India.

Ray Mali, the former ICC president, has recommended the setting up of a sub-committee to "advise the ICC board on all matters relating to Zimbabwe cricket including its return to full participation in the international game. The specific terms of reference for the sub-committee will be finalised in due course." The sub-committee, if approved, will chaired by Julian Hunte, the head of the West Indies board, and include Arjuna Ranatunga and another official (who hasn't been confirmed).


Norman Arendse, the president of Cricket South Africa, was satisfied with the ICC's resolution on Zimbabwe. "Cricket South Africa welcomes the ICC resolution on Zimbabwe as a step forward in the right direction," Arendse said. "The Zimbabwe issue is difficult and complex, and was discussed at length. At least, the ICC decision extricates all Full Member countries from the potential problem of the Twenty20 tournament to be played in England in 2009.

"CSA's recently articulated position in relation to Zimbabwe Cricket will, however, remain as is, until the Zimbabwe situation is resolved to the satisfaction of all parties concerned."



This seems like the worst possible outcome. The players are punished by not getting to play at a good level of cricket, and the corrupt ZCU officials still get to siphon off the ICC funding, including the tournament fee.

Grrrr.
Please note, although no boardcode buttons are shown, they are still useable
 
Logged Logged  
 
#60347
ursus arctos
Posts: 3765
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
posted 04-07-2008 11:40

 
It was hinted at on the "Hair-story" thread, but I completely agree; this is the worst possible outcome.
Please note, although no boardcode buttons are shown, they are still useable
 
Logged Logged  
 
#60826
Guy Potger
Posts: 291
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
posted 05-07-2008 15:22

 
If it was a quid pro quo for the Oval result, then there's at least someone who's prepared to stand by his own principles.
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/current/story/359325.html


(I don't know if this belongs here or in the "Hair Story" thread. Apologies if it's already there)
Please note, although no boardcode buttons are shown, they are still useable
 
Logged Logged  
 
#60835
Guy Potger
Posts: 291
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
posted 05-07-2008 15:38

 
Mighty Mudhsuden wrote:
QUOTE:
If not, this has just come out (courtesy cricinfo):



This seems like the worst possible outcome. The players are punished by not getting to play at a good level of cricket, and the corrupt ZCU officials still get to siphon off the ICC funding, including the tournament fee.

Grrrr.


It appears you are wrong, and that no less a luminary than Giles Clarke has stated it's a "win-win" situation.


As much as it leaves a bad taste in the mouth, I csn't really say I'm that surprised that this, or something like it, has been the outcome of this; it's difficult to think of any other scenario that wouldn't hve introduced an immediate, and deep schism in World cricket.
Please note, although no boardcode buttons are shown, they are still useable
 
Logged Logged  
 
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop